首页> 外文学位 >Mandibular motor control during the early development of speech and nonspeech behaviors.
【24h】

Mandibular motor control during the early development of speech and nonspeech behaviors.

机译:言语和非言语行为的早期发展过程中的下颌运动控制。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Physiologic investigations of the organization of mandibular muscle activity in infants support the notion that motor control for speech emerges from a coordinative organization distinct from those underlying nonspeech behaviors, such as chewing (e.g., Moore & Ruark, 1996). Differences have also been reported between babble and true words (Moore & Ruark, 1996). Grillner (1982) and others (MacNeilage, 1998) have suggested that the development of motor control for speech may originate from the recombination of innate motor programs such as that for chewing. This hypothesis has promoted specific assumptions regarding development of lexical and phonetic motor planning, the ontogeny of motor control for speech, and jaw coordination and the resultant kinematics during emergent babble (e.g., Locke, 2000; MacNeilage, 1998; MacNeilage & Davis 2001). The current investigation used six indices of mandibular coordination at three levels of analysis: mandibular kinematics, the association of EMG and jaw movement, and the association of muscle groups (EMG). EMG and kinematic data were recorded from an infant, from 8 to 22 months of age, at 4 to 6 week intervals. The parents were native English speakers. Nonspeech tasks included chewing and jaw oscillation; speech tasks included multisyllabic syllables, levels one (i.e., vowel babble), two (e.g., reduplicative syllables), and three (i.e., variegated syllables), and monosyllables. Rate and complexity of jaw movement were significantly different between nonspeech and speech tasks, and differences in complexity were noted among speech tasks and across levels of multisyllables. Correlated changes in EMG and subsequent jaw movement, and in EMG modulation and jaw movement, were different between nonspeech and speech tasks, and among nonspeech tasks, speech, and multisyllables. Only nonspeech tasks exhibited significant linear relationships between peak frequencies for EMG modulation, for all muscle groups, with that for associated jaw movement. Differences in the organization of muscle activity and in the correlation of modulation across muscles groups were noted between nonspeech and speech tasks, and among nonspeech tasks, speech, and multisyllables. Differences between and among speech and nonspeech tasks suggested that motor control develops as the product of emerging, interdependent capacities of the infant, as well as by the requirements imposed on it by the demands of the given task.
机译:婴儿下颌骨肌肉活动组织的生理学研究支持以下观点:对言语的运动控制来自与诸如语音等基本非言语行为不同的协调组织(例如,Moore&Ruark,1996)。也有报道说reported不休与真实话语之间存在差异(Moore&Ruark,1996)。 Grillner(1982)和其他学者(MacNeilage,1998)提出,语音运动控制的发展可能源于固有的运动程序(如咀嚼程序)的重组。这个假设促进了关于词汇和语音运动计划的发展,言语运动控制的本体论,言语运动的下颌协调性以及在胡言乱语期间产生的运动学的特定假设(例如,Locke,2000; MacNeilage,1998; MacNeilage&Davis 2001)。当前的研究在三个分析级别上使用了六个下颌协调指数:下颌运动学,EMG和下颌运动的关联以及肌肉群(EMG)的关联。记录了8至22个月大婴儿的肌电图和运动学数据,间隔为4至6周。父母都是说英语的人。非语音任务包括咀嚼和下颚摆动;语音任务包括多音节音节,一级(即元音wel语),二级(例如重复音节)和三级(即杂色音节)和单音节。在非语音和语音任务之间,下颌运动的速度和复杂性显着不同,并且在语音任务之间以及跨多个音节的水平之间,也注意到了复杂性的差异。在非语音和语音任务之间以及非语音任务,语音和多音节之间,EMG和随后的下颌运动以及EMG调制和下颌运动的相关变化是不同的。只有非语音任务在所有肌肉群的EMG调制峰值频率和相关的颚运动之间显示出显着的线性关系。注意到在非语音和语音任务之间以及非语音任务,语音和多音节之间,肌肉活动的组织和各个肌肉群之间调制相关性的差异。语音和非语音任务之间的差异表明,运动控制的发展是婴儿新兴的,相互依存的能力以及给定任务的要求对其施加的要求的产物。

著录项

  • 作者

    Steeve, Roger W.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Washington.;

  • 授予单位 University of Washington.;
  • 学科 Health Sciences Speech Pathology.;Health Sciences Human Development.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2004
  • 页码 277 p.
  • 总页数 277
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号