首页> 外文学位 >Kant's critical theory of modality: A basis for a moral metaphysics.
【24h】

Kant's critical theory of modality: A basis for a moral metaphysics.

机译:康德的情态批判理论:道德形而上学的基础。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Kant demonstrates that we can have rational grounds for holding a belief in the existence of supersensible things that we can never know with certainty. I argue that at the basis of this accomplishment lies a hitherto neglected part of Kant's philosophy: the novel approach Kant brings to the understanding of modalities (possibility, actuality, and necessity). This approach consists in defining modalities in terms of theoretical and practical relations between objects and the subject rather than the ways objects are.;Until the mid1760's, Kant's views on modalities do not display a deep breakthrough from the prevalent conception in the "school" metaphysics, but rather a revisionist approach. Not yet opposed to conceiving modalities in ontological terms, Kant rejects only the inclusion of modalities as predicates in the concepts of things. Yet, from the mid1760's onwards, we see in Kant a shift toward an understanding of modalities in more epistemological terms, as pertaining to the relationship between the epistemic subject and objects.;Kant's early revisionist critique develops into a revolutionary theory of modality in the Critique of Pure Reason. This theory introduces a subjectivist perspective according to which to ascribe a modal status to an object is to posit it in relation to the cognitive faculty of the subject, according to the conditions of experience. This new perspective rules out the possibility of any theoretical proof of the existence of supersensible objects such as God, freedom and immortality, thus undermining the cardinal claims of traditional metaphysics.;Interestingly enough, this conception of modality enables Kant to reestablish these claims in a different domain. In the Critique of Practical Reason , Kant introduces a notion of "practical cognition," which relies on the ascription of modal categories to objects in accordance with their necessary connections to the moral law. It is in virtue of this use of modality that freedom, God and immortality are postulated to be actual, but only as articles of belief rather than knowledge. Therefore, Kant's treatment of modality plays an indispensable role both in his theoretical rehabilitation of traditional metaphysics and in his construction of a new metaphysics upon practical premises.
机译:康德表明,我们可以有理由相信我们永远无法确定地知道的超明智事物的存在。我认为,这一成就的基础在于康德哲学迄今被忽视的一部分:康德带来的新颖方法使人们对模式(可能性,现实性和必要性)有了理解。这种方法在于根据客体与客体之间的理论和实践关系而不是客体的方式来定义模态。直到1760年代中期,康德对模态的观点仍未从“学校”形而上学的普遍概念上显示出深刻的突破。 ,而是一种修正主义的方法。康德还没有反对以本体论的术语来构想模态,而是仅拒绝将模态作为事物概念中的谓词包括在内。然而,从1760年代中期开始,我们在康德看到了一种转向,以更多的认识论术语来理解模态,涉及到认知主体与客体之间的关系。康德的早期修正主义批判在批判中发展成为一种革命性的情态理论。纯理性。该理论引入了一种主观主义的观点,根据这种观点,根据经验条件,将一种物态状态归因于一个对象,并将其相对于该对象的认知能力而言。这种新的观点排除了任何理论上证明存在诸如上帝,自由和永生之类的超明智对象的可能性,从而破坏了传统形而上学的基本主张。有趣的是,这种形式的概念使康德能够在一个新的世界中重新确立这些主张。不同的域。康德在《实践理性批判》中引入了“实践认知”的概念,该概念依赖于情态范畴对客体的划分,并根据它们与道德法则的必要联系。正是由于这种形式的使用,自由,神和永生被假定为是实际的,但仅作为信仰而非知识。因此,康德对情态的处理在他对传统形而上学的理论复兴和他在实际前提下建构新的形而上学都起着不可或缺的作用。

著录项

  • 作者

    Abaci, Uygar.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Pennsylvania.;

  • 授予单位 University of Pennsylvania.;
  • 学科 Epistemology.;Metaphysics.;Philosophy.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2011
  • 页码 500 p.
  • 总页数 500
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:44:34

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号