首页> 外文学位 >Fairness in feedback: Effects of justice in performance appraisal.
【24h】

Fairness in feedback: Effects of justice in performance appraisal.

机译:反馈公平:绩效评估中公正的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Organizational justice is a critical indicator of performance appraisal reactions. Several studies indicate that employees react more favorably to fair performance appraisals (Korsgaard & Roberson, 1995; Taylor, Masterson, Renard, & Tracy, 1998) and that fairness is required for performance appraisals to have a positive impact on employee performance (Cook & Crossman, 2004; Murphy & Cleveland, 1995). Using a longitudinal design and multiple data sources and applying the agent-system model, this study examined the differential influence of procedural, distributive, informational, and interpersonal justice on leader-member exchange, and employee performance (task and contextual) and attitudes (commitment). The impact of procedural, informational, and interpersonal justice perceptions on subsequent distributive justice perceptions was also examined. Finally, LMX and Work Locus of Control (WLOC) were also examined as potential moderators of the relationship between justice and employee outcomes. As predicted, informational justice was found to predict significantly more variance in LMX than interpersonal justice. However, contrary to predictions and the agent-system model, the four dimensions of justice did not consistently and differentially predict agent and system-level outcomes. Procedural, informational, and interpersonal justice did not have a significant impact on distributive justice perceptions. Furthermore, supervisor-rated LMX moderated the relationship between distributive justice and contextual performance and commitment, whereas employee-rated LMX did not moderate any of the proposed relationships. Results also did not support WLOC as a moderator. Post-hoc analyses demonstrated an interaction between distributive justice and LMX inflation, an imbalanced positive perception of the LMX relationship by the supervisor or subordinate, to predict contextual performance and commitment. Limitations and future directions regarding examination of the impact of LMX inflation on other organizational outcomes and subsequent perceptions of LMX are discussed.
机译:组织公正是绩效评估反应的关键指标。多项研究表明,员工对公平绩效评估的反应更有利(Korsgaard&Roberson,1995; Taylor,Masterson,Renard和Tracy,1998),绩效评估要求公平对员工绩效产生积极影响(Cook&Crossman) (2004; Murphy&Cleveland,1995)。本研究使用纵向设计和多个数据源并应用代理系统模型,研究了程序,分配,信息和人际正义对领导成员交换,员工绩效(任务和环境)和态度(承诺)的不同影响。 )。还研究了程序,信息和人际正义观念对随后的分配正义观念的影响。最后,LMX和工作控制源(WLOC)也作为正义与员工成果之间关系的潜在调节者进行了检验。如预期的那样,发现信息正义比人际正义更能预测LMX的差异。但是,与预测和代理人系统模型相反,司法的四个维度并未一致且有差异地预测代理人和系统级结果。程序正义,信息正义和人际正义对分配正义的看法没有重大影响。此外,由主管评定的LMX调节了分配正义与背景绩效和承诺之间的关系,而由雇员评定的LMX并未调节任何提议的关系。结果还不支持WLOC作为主持人。事后分析表明,分配正义与LMX通货膨胀之间存在相互作用,主管或下属对LMX关系的积极看法不平衡,可以预测背景绩效和承诺。讨论了关于检查LMX通货膨胀对其他组织成果的影响以及随后对LMX的认识的局限性和未来的方向。

著录项

  • 作者

    Wilson, Raenada.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Houston.;

  • 授予单位 University of Houston.;
  • 学科 Business Administration Management.;Psychology Industrial.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2011
  • 页码 122 p.
  • 总页数 122
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号