首页> 外文学位 >Dynamics of popular contentions in mid-Qing China.
【24h】

Dynamics of popular contentions in mid-Qing China.

机译:清中叶大众争论的动态。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In the last three decades, a spate of research brought to light the dynamics of popular contentions in early modern Europe. These studies suggest that surges of commerce and centralized state power led to a transition of popular contentions from reactive to proactive claims, and from violent to non-violent repertories. This literature assumes that the Western path of development of contention is unique, and non-Western paths of development following the "impact of the West" and the disintegration of the premodern "oriental despotic" system are simply repetitions of the Western experience. This research is an attempt to examine the patterns of popular contentious in late imperial China (c. 1600--1900), with a focus on c. 1740--1840, a period when China's political economy was characterized by a commercialized economy, centralized state, and looming ecological crisis. Based on a catalog of contentious events derived from archival sources, I find that the changes in the patterns and dynamics of different types of contention (including political protest, class conflict, heterodox revolt and organized predatory activities) are functions of the particular trajectories of commercialization, state formation, and ecological degradation in mid-Qing China. They are comparable with but also distinctive from the patterns and dynamics of contention in contemporaneous Europe. In sum, political protest changed from predominantly proactive, peaceful actions in the early eighteenth century to reactive violence in the early nineteenth century. Class conflict changed from predominantly intra-communal conflicts between haves and have-nots in the early eighteenth century to actions that protect local communities' rights to subsistence against profit-making activities of the merchants in the early nineteenth century. Heterodox revolts and organized predatory activities were kept at bay by the strong imperial state, but were never rooted out in the eighteenth century. I argue that the modern revolutionary movement in twentieth-century China was a continuation and convergence of the traditions of political protest, heterodox revolts, and predatory activities in the mid-Qing period. This study shows that "modernization" of contentious politics in non-Western civilizations is rarely a simple repetition of the Western way, but is rather a complex hybridization of the Western influences and indigenous tracks of development.
机译:在过去的三十年中,一系列研究揭示了近代早期欧洲流行的争论的动态。这些研究表明,商业和中央国家权力的激增导致了流行的争论从被动的主张过渡到主动的主张,从暴力到非暴力的资源。该文献认为,西方争执的发展道路是独特的,遵循“西方的冲击”和前现代的“东方专制”体系的瓦解的非西方发展道路只是西方经验的重复。这项研究旨在检验帝制晚期(约1600--1900年)的大众争论模式,重点是c。 1740--1840年,中国政治经济以商品化经济,中央集权国家和迫在眉睫的生态危机为特征。根据从档案来源得出的一系列有争议的事件,我发现不同类型的竞争(包括政治抗议,阶级冲突,异端叛乱和有组织的掠夺活动)的模式和动态变化是商业化特定轨迹的功能,状态形成和中国中部的生态退化。它们可与当代欧洲的竞争模式和动态相媲美,但也有区别。总而言之,政治抗议活动从18世纪初期的积极主动的和平行动转变为19世纪初期的被动暴力。阶级冲突从18世纪初期的贫富之间的主要内部冲突转变为保护当地社区的权利,以维持其抵抗商人在19世纪初期的牟利活动的权利。强大的帝国制阻止了异教徒的叛乱和有组织的掠夺活动,但在18世纪从未根除。我认为,二十世纪中国的现代革命运动是政治抗议,异端叛乱和掠夺性活动在清中期的传统的延续和融合。这项研究表明,非西方文明中有争议的政治的“现代化”很少是西方方式的简单重复,而是西方影响与本土发展轨迹的复杂混合。

著录项

  • 作者

    Hung, Ho-fung.;

  • 作者单位

    The Johns Hopkins University.;

  • 授予单位 The Johns Hopkins University.;
  • 学科 Sociology Social Structure and Development.; History Asia Australia and Oceania.; Political Science General.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2004
  • 页码 364 p.
  • 总页数 364
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 社会结构和社会关系;世界史;政治理论;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号