This article examines the UN Security Council's 1267 sanctions regime. Initially adopted in 1999, the sanctions regime has undergone various reforms in response to criticisms from various channels, including domestic and regional courts. Despite the reforms, the 1267 regime continues to fall short of the standards required to ensure a fair and public hearing by a competent, independent and impartial tribunal established by law. Reviewing recent developments, the article addresses the need for additional safeguards and possible reform options. In particular, the paper explores international standards for reviewing secret intelligence evidence based on the jurisprudence of international criminal tribunals and argues that such evidentiary procedures have the potential to be used as a guide for reviewing 1267 listing.
展开▼
