首页> 外文学位 >Student facilitation and predictors of engagement in peer-led literature circle discussions.
【24h】

Student facilitation and predictors of engagement in peer-led literature circle discussions.

机译:学生的便利和参与由同led主导的文学作品的预测因素会引起讨论。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The purpose of this research was to examine the relation between students' personality traits and the extent of their engagement and facilitation in peer-led literature circle discussions. The research was guided by two questions. To what extent do reading ability, gender, and personality traits predict the quality of verbal engagement in literature circles? and How do highly engaged participants facilitate discussion in the circles?;The researcher video-taped 17 fourth-grade students' literature circle discussions for a total of 136.7 minutes collected on two separate occasions across two weeks. To answer the first question student contributions in discussions were quantified into a measure of quality of verbal engagement score (cf. Costa & Kallick, 2000). This quality of verbal engagement score served as the dependent variable in a multiple regression. The seven independent variables were (1) extroversion, (2) agreeableness, (3) conscientiousness, (4) emotional stability, (5) openness, (6) reading ability, and (7) gender. The quantitative analysis in this study revealed that emotional stability was the only significant variable that predicted higher quality of verbal engagement. A post hoc analysis that included group size as an additional variable revealed that groups composed of three members correlated with higher overall quality of verbal engagement. The second question was answered through a qualitative analysis of the following: exploratory talk, elaborative feedback, topic management, confessionals, and accountability. Results of this analysis suggest that highly engaged students frequently enhance the group discussions through facilitation.;This study extended the extant research by investigating individual factors that may influence the quality of literature circle discussions as well as suggested a framework for understanding facilitation in peer-led literature circle discussions. Further research is needed to determine the influence of group size and personality on varying grade levels.
机译:这项研究的目的是检验学生的人格特质与他们在同伴主导的文学界讨论中的参与和促进程度之间的关系。该研究以两个问题为指导。阅读能力,性别和人格特质在多大程度上预测了文学界言语交往的质量?高度参与的参与者如何促进圈子中的讨论?;研究人员将17个四年级学生的文学圈子讨论录像了下来,总共花了136.7分钟,这是在两周内两次分别进行的。为了回答第一个问题,学生在讨论中的贡献被量化为口头参与得分质量的衡量标准(参见Costa&Kallick,2000)。言语参与得分的这种质量在多元回归中用作因变量。这七个独立变量是:(1)外向,(2)和agree可亲,(3)尽责,(4)情绪稳定,(5)开放性,(6)阅读能力和(7)性别。这项研究中的定量分析表明,情绪稳定是预测言语交往质量更高的唯一重要变量。事后分析包括小组人数作为附加变量,发现由三名成员组成的小组与较高的口头交流总体质量相关。通过对以下内容的定性分析,回答了第二个问题:探索性谈话,详尽的反馈,主题管理,conf悔和问责制。分析结果表明,高度敬业的学生经常通过促进来促进小组讨论。;本研究通过调查可能影响文学界讨论质量的个体因素,并提出了一个理解同行主导的促进框架的框架,从而扩展了现有研究。文学界的讨论。需要进一步研究以确定小组规模和个性对不同年级水平的影响。

著录项

  • 作者

    Young, Chase.;

  • 作者单位

    University of North Texas.;

  • 授予单位 University of North Texas.;
  • 学科 Education Language and Literature.;Education Elementary.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2012
  • 页码 173 p.
  • 总页数 173
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:43:45

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号