首页> 外文学位 >Targeting braf and nf1 mutations in glioma.
【24h】

Targeting braf and nf1 mutations in glioma.

机译:针对胶质瘤中的braf和nf1突变。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Gliomas are responsible for a disproportionate share of cancer-related morbidity and mortality, despite being less common than other cancers, so treatments for glioma patients are a serious unmet need. About 3% of gliomas harbor either constitutively activating point mutations or fusions in the gene BRAF which activate the BRAF MEK-ERK pathway. Because there are specific inhibitors for this pathway available, in this work we interrogated the underling biology of the sensitivity of BRAF-mutant gliomas to these inhibitors. We identified cell lines with BRAF mutations and showed that BRAF-V600E gliomas are dependent on BRAF signaling and MEK kinase activity for tumor maintenance. Next we showed that the monomeric BRAF inhibitor vemurafenib is able to inhibit mutant-BRAF signaling in glioma, However, this inhibition is transient, and ERK phosphorylation quickly rebounds. This ERK rebound is associated with incomplete inhibition of Cyclin D1 and lack of growth suppression. We then sought to identify possible candidate RTKs that were upregulated by relief of ERK-dependent feedback and might reactivate ERK signaling. We found that ERBB family members and their activity were upregulated. However, we also found that EGFR and HER2 kinase activity does not appear to be necessary in order to induce ERK rebound. We then looked into the role of negative feedback on RAS signaling and showed that vemurafenib relieves negative feedback on RAS signaling, leading to increases in RAS-GTP and the induction of a vemurafenib insensitive state. However, drugs that target the RAF dimers that are a product of increased RAS-GTP are able potently suppress ERK rebound, Cyclin D1 expression, and achieve greater growth suppression. Finally, we tried to understand the role of the RAS-GAP NF1 in GBM. We established and biochemically validated an inducible NF1 expression system and examined its biological role. Interestingly, NF1 expression is not growth suppressive in all NF1-deficient cell lines. Despite this, NF1-deficient cell lines appear to maintain a MEK dependency that can be therapeutically targeted with a MEK inhibitor, even though NF1 reconstitution has little direct effect on MEK and ERK signaling. Together, this works describes alterations at two different nodes of the MAP-Kinase pathway and their therapeutic relevance.
机译:尽管与其他癌症相比,神经胶质瘤在癌症相关的发病率和死亡率中所占的比例不成比例,但胶质瘤患者的治疗是亟待解决的问题。约3%的神经胶质瘤在构成BRAF的基因中包含组成性激活点突变或融合,其激活BRAF MEK-ERK途径。由于存在针对该途径的特定抑制剂,因此在这项工作中,我们询问了BRAF突变型神经胶质瘤对这些抑制剂的敏感性的基础生物学。我们鉴定出具有BRAF突变的细胞系,并表明BRAF-V600E胶质瘤依赖BRAF信号传导和MEK激酶活性来维持肿瘤。接下来,我们证明了单体BRAF抑制剂vemurafenib能够抑制神经胶质瘤中的突变BRAF信号传导,但是这种抑制作用是短暂的,并且ERK磷酸化迅速反弹。这种ERK反弹与细胞周期蛋白D1的不完全抑制和缺乏生长抑制有关。然后,我们试图确定可能的候选RTK,这些候选RTK通过缓解ERK依赖性反馈而上调,并且可能重新激活ERK信号。我们发现ERBB家庭成员及其活动被上调。但是,我们还发现EGFR和HER2激酶活性似乎对于诱导ERK反弹不是必需的。然后,我们研究了负反馈在RAS信号传导中的作用,并表明vemurafenib缓解了RAS信号的负反馈,从而导致RAS-GTP升高并诱导了vemurafenib不敏感状态。但是,靶向RAS-GTP升高的产物RAF二聚体的药物能够有效抑制ERK反弹,Cyclin D1表达并实现更大的生长抑制。最后,我们试图了解RAS-GAP NF1在GBM中的作用。我们建立并通过生物化学方法验证了诱导型NF1表达系统,并检查了其生物学作用。有趣的是,在所有缺乏NF1的细胞系中,NF1的表达均不能抑制生长。尽管如此,即使NF1重构对MEK和ERK信号传导几乎没有直接影响,但NF1缺陷型细胞系似乎仍可以维持MEK抑制剂的治疗靶点。总之,这项工作描述了MAP激酶途径的两个不同节点的改变及其治疗意义。

著录项

  • 作者

    Kaufmann, Michael Chad.;

  • 作者单位

    Weill Medical College of Cornell University.;

  • 授予单位 Weill Medical College of Cornell University.;
  • 学科 Pharmacology.;Biochemistry.;Oncology.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2016
  • 页码 150 p.
  • 总页数 150
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:42:45

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号