首页> 外文学位 >The evolution of sin: Sin, theistic evolution, and the biological question---a theological account.
【24h】

The evolution of sin: Sin, theistic evolution, and the biological question---a theological account.

机译:罪恶的演变:罪恶,有神论的演变和生物学问题-神学的解释。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Theistic evolutionists, especially those in the science-and-theology field, have done more than any other group to wrestle with the challenges that evolutionary biology presents to the doctrine of sin. Their work deserves our attention and admiration. Christian theology can learn from questions that are being raised about our biological condition since these have often been ignored or superficially treated in standard formulations of the doctrine of sin. The thesis of this dissertation, however, is that the majority of proposals by theistic evolutionists to reinterpret key elements of the doctrine of sin either ignore or significantly misrepresent the canonical witness and the consensus of the catholic tradition. In the first place, mainstream theistic evolutionists deny the doctrine of Adam's fall (originating sin); in the second place, the doctrine of originated (or inherited) sin has been increasingly recast as a thesis about biology, or less provocatively, as a thesis about the interaction between biology and the environment; in the third place, there is a widespread rejection of anthropological dualism within the academy in favor of monistic accounts of the human constitution. On each of these fronts, the doctrine of sin firmly resists attempts at biological assimilation and scientific revision. In critical dialogue with the key representatives in the academic discipline of science-and-theology, I argue instead that a constructive, but not uncritical, retrieval of the Augustinian doctrine of sin, sensitive to theological questions raised by modern biology, provides a far more compelling account of sin for a post-Darwinian age.
机译:有神论的进化论者,尤其是科学和神学领域的进化论者,在克服进化生物学对罪学说提出的挑战方面比其他任何组织都做得更多。他们的工作值得我们关注和钦佩。基督教神学可以从关于我们的生物学状况提出的问题中学习,因为这些问题在罪恶学说的标准表述中经常被忽略或表面地对待。然而,本论文的论点是,有神论的进化论者提出的大多数关于重新解释犯罪学说的关键要素的提议要么无视,要么就严重地误解了正统的证人和天主教传统的共识。首先,主流的有神论进化论者否认亚当堕落(起源罪)的学说。其次,起源(或遗传)罪的学说已被越来越多地改写为关于生物学的论断,或者更少地是作为一种关于生物学与环境之间相互作用的论断的煽动性;第三,学术界普遍反对人类学二元论,而赞成对人类体质的一元论。在上述每一个方面,犯罪学说都坚决抵制生物同化和科学修正的尝试。在与科学理论神学学科的主要代表进行的批判性对话中,我认为,对现代生物学提出的神学问题敏感的,对奥古斯丁罪学说的建设性但并非非批判性的检索提供了更多的东西。关于达尔文时代后的犯罪的令人信服的解释。

著录项

  • 作者

    Madueme, Hans.;

  • 作者单位

    Trinity International University.;

  • 授予单位 Trinity International University.;
  • 学科 Theology.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2012
  • 页码 458 p.
  • 总页数 458
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号