首页> 外文学位 >Comparative analysis of select scales on the M-PULSE Inventory and MMPI-2: Predicting police officer performance from pre-employment psychological evaluations.
【24h】

Comparative analysis of select scales on the M-PULSE Inventory and MMPI-2: Predicting police officer performance from pre-employment psychological evaluations.

机译:M-PULSE量表和MMPI-2上的选定量表的比较分析:从职前心理评估预测警务人员的表现。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Due to the often stressful and demanding nature of law enforcement work, it is essential law enforcement officers are mentally and emotionally capable of performing their duties. A review of state statutes shows most states require individuals wishing to become law enforcement officers to undergo a psychological evaluation before they are hired as officers. Though these pre-employment psychological evaluations are mandated by many states statutes or regulations, there is little standardization as to what psychological instruments are used. Federal mandates such as the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 place limitations on what psychological instruments may be used and when pre-employment psychological evaluations may be conducted. Furthermore, federal and state case law help govern the types of psychological instruments which may be used for pre-employment purposes. Of most importance is a psychological instrument's ability to predict psychological or behavioral constructs related to job performance. Often, this is accomplished by establishing an instrument's predictive validity. Psychological instruments used in law enforcement pre-employment psychological evaluations which have not been shown to relate to the job performance of a law enforcement officer should not be utilized.;The current study examined the predictive capacity of scores produced from selected scales of two psychological instruments used in law enforcement pre-employment psychological evaluations - the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory - 2 (MMPI-2) and the Matrix-Predictive Uniform Law Enforcement Selection Evaluation (M-PULSE) Inventory. Using a data sample of 200 law enforcement officer's pre-employment psychological evaluation results, the Empirical Scale scores from the M- PULSE Inventory and Psychopathic Deviate and Hypomania Clinical Scale scores from the MMPI-2 were used as predictor variables in a discriminant function analysis to predict future officer misconduct. These scales were selected based on their comparable item components designed to measure maladaptive psychosocial and behavioral traits, as well as their frequency in psychological literature. Results from the analyses indicated the M-PULSE Inventory Scale scores were significant predictors of future officer misconduct. Theses scales were also predictors of other job performance errors as well. The MMPI-2 Scale scores were not shown to be predictive of job performance. Findings, limitations, and suggestions for further research are discussed.
机译:由于执法工作通常压力大,要求高,因此,执法人员在心理和情感上有能力履行职责是必不可少的。对州法规的审查显示,大多数州要求希望成为执法人员的人员在被雇用为人员之前接受心理评估。尽管许多州的法规或法规要求进行这些职前心理评估,但是关于使用何种心理手段的标准化却很少。诸如1964年《民权法案》和1990年《美国残疾人法案》之类的联邦法规对可以使用哪些心理工具以及何时进行职前心理评估进行了限制。此外,联邦和州判例法有助于管理可能用于就业前目的的心理手段的类型。最重要的是一种心理工具预测与工作绩效有关的心理或行为结构的能力。通常,这是通过建立仪器的预测有效性来完成的。不应使用尚未被证明与执法人员的工作表现有关的,用于执法前的心理评估的心理工具。;本研究调查了从两种心理工具的选定量表得出的分数的预测能力用于执法前职前心理评估-明尼苏达州多相人格问卷-2(MMPI-2)和矩阵预测统一执法选择评估(M-PULSE)问卷。使用200名执法人员的职前心理评估结果的数据样本,将M-PULSE量表和精神病性偏倚和低躁狂症的经验量表得分和MMPI-2的低躁狂临床量表得分用作判别函数分析的预测变量,以进行预测未来人员的不当行为。选择这些量表的依据是其可比较的项目组件,这些组件旨在测量适应不良的心理和行为特征,以及它们在心理学文献中的出现频率。分析结果表明,M-PULSE库存量表得分是未来官员行为不检的重要预测指标。这些量表也是其他工作绩效错误的预测指标。 MMPI-2量表分数未显示可预测工作绩效。讨论了发现,局限性和进一步研究的建议。

著录项

  • 作者

    Adam, Benjamin James.;

  • 作者单位

    Alliant International University.;

  • 授予单位 Alliant International University.;
  • 学科 Law.;Psychology Industrial.;Psychology General.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2013
  • 页码 178 p.
  • 总页数 178
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号