首页> 外文期刊>Psychological assessment >The Comparative Capacity of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 (MMPI-2) and MMPI-2 Restructured Form (MMPI-2-RF) Validity Scales to Detect Suspected Malingering in a Disability Claimant Sample
【24h】

The Comparative Capacity of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 (MMPI-2) and MMPI-2 Restructured Form (MMPI-2-RF) Validity Scales to Detect Suspected Malingering in a Disability Claimant Sample

机译:明尼苏达多相性人格库存-2(MMPI-2)和MMPI-2重组形式(MMPI-2-RF)有效性尺度的比较能力,以检测残疾人索赔样品中的怀疑恶性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The current study expands on past research examining the comparative capacity of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 (MMPI-2; Butcher et al., 2001) and MMPI-2 Restructured Form (MMPI-2-RF; Ben-Porath & Tellegen, 2008/2011) overreporting validity scales to detect suspected malingering, as assessed by the Miller Forensic Assessment of Symptoms Test (M-FAST; Miller, 2001), in a sample of public insurance disability claimants (N = 742) who were considered to have potential incentives to malinger. Results provide support for the capacity of both the MMPI-2 and the MMPI-2-RF overreporting validity scales to predict suspected malingering of psychopathology. The MMPI-2-RF overreporting validity scales proved to be modestly better predictors of suspected psychopathology malingering-compared with the MMPI-2 overreporting scales-in dimensional predictive models and categorical classification accuracy analyses.
机译:目前的研究拓展了过去的研究,检查明尼苏达多相人格库存-2(MMPI-2; Butcher等,2001)和MMPI-2重组形式的比较能力(MMPI-2-RF; Ben-Porath&Tellegen, 2008/2011)通过米勒法医评估症状测试评估(M-Fast; Miller,2001),在被认为拥有的公共保险残疾人索赔人(n = 742)的样本中,通过米勒法医评估评估(M-Fast; Miller,2001)评估,以检测有效性尺度。 Malinger的潜在激励措施。 结果提供了对MMPI-2和MMPI-2-RF过度报告有效性尺度的能力,以预测受疑性能的心脏病病理学的能力。 MMPI-2-RF超报证明,有效性尺度被证明是适度更好的怀疑精神病理学的预测因子,与MMPI-2过度报告尺寸的维度预测模型和分类分类精度分析相比。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号