首页> 外文学位 >Psychometric properties of the coping inventory for stressful situations in individuals with traumatic brain injury.
【24h】

Psychometric properties of the coping inventory for stressful situations in individuals with traumatic brain injury.

机译:应对脑外伤患者的压力状况的应对方法的心理计量学特性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Although research suggests that coping style affects recovery from traumatic brain injury (TBI), research on assessment of coping style after TBI is sparse. Prevalent theories in the general coping literature suggest a three-factor structure of coping style: task-, emotion-, and avoidance-oriented. However, this factor structure might not well characterize coping after TBI given the cognitive and emotional deficits associated with this population. Therefore, this study examined the psychometric properties of the Coping Inventory for Stressful Situations (CISS) among persons with moderate to severe TBI using approaches from Classical Test Theory (CTT) and Item Response Theory (IRT; Rasch analysis). This study also examined the relationship between coping style and TBI recovery, including subjective and objective well-being outcomes. Participants were 331 adults with moderate to severe TBI who were 1 to 15 years post injury. This was an archival study of a prospective data registry, examining cross-sectional assessments completed at 1, 2, 5, 10 and 15 years post injury. The primary measure of interest was the CISS. Outcomes included the Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS) and Disability Rating Scale (DRS). Predictors included demographic (age, education) and injury severity (Glasgow Coma Scale, DRS at discharge) characteristics, Positive (PA) and Negative (NA) Affectivity scales of the Positive Affective and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS), and the CISS (Task, Emotion, Distraction, and Social Diversion scales). Analyses from CTT and IRT approaches supported the reliability of the CISS among individuals with TBI across short- and long-term adjustment to injury and at various disability levels (median coefficient alpha = .89). Both approaches also supported the three-factor structure of the CISS in persons with TBI. Rasch analysis provided good psychometric support for the use of the CISS with TBI and identified areas for improved item discrimination. Hierarchical multiple regression analyses found that coping style uniquely predicted disability and life satisfaction at follow-up after accounting for sociodemographic factors, injury severity, and affectivity. These findings extend psychometric support for the CISS to the moderate to severe TBI population and highlight the clinical utility of assessing coping style with TBI for predicting functional and subjective well-being.
机译:尽管研究表明应对方式影响创伤性脑损伤(TBI)的恢复,但对TBI后评估应对方式的研究很少。一般应对文学中的流行理论提出了应对因素的三要素结构:任务型,情感型和回避型。但是,考虑到与该人群有关的认知和情感缺陷,这种因素的结构可能无法很好地描述TBI后的应对方式。因此,本研究使用经典测试理论(CTT)和项目反应理论(IRT; Rasch分析)的方法,对中度至重度TBI患者的压力状况应对量表(CISS)的心理测量特性进行了研究。这项研究还研究了应对方式与TBI恢复之间的关系,包括主观和客观的幸福感结果。参与者为331名受伤后1至15年的中度至重度TBI成人。这是前瞻性数据注册表的档案研究,检查了在受伤后1、2、5、10和15年完成的横断面评估。感兴趣的主要指标是CISS。结果包括生活满意度量表(SWLS)和残疾评定量表(DRS)。预测因素包括人口统计学(年龄,教育程度)和伤害严重程度(格拉斯哥昏迷量表,出院时的DRS)特征,积极情感和消极情感时间表(PANAS)的积极(PA)和消极(NA)情感等级,以及CISS(任务,情绪,分心和社交转移量表)。来自CTT和IRT方法的分析支持TBI个体在短期和长期适应损伤以及各种残疾水平(中位数系数α= 0.89)上的CISS可靠性。两种方法都支持TBI患者的CISS三因素结构。 Rasch分析为带有TBI的CISS的使用提供了良好的心理支持,并确定了可改善项目区分的区域。分层多元回归分析发现,应对方式独特地预测了社会人口统计学因素,伤害严重性和情感性后的残疾和生活满意度。这些发现将对CISS的心理测量支持扩展到了中度至重度TBI人群,并突出了评估TBI应对方式以预测功能和主观幸福感的临床实用性。

著录项

  • 作者

    Greene, Hillary A.;

  • 作者单位

    Wayne State University.;

  • 授予单位 Wayne State University.;
  • 学科 Psychology General.;Psychology Clinical.
  • 学位 M.S.
  • 年度 2013
  • 页码 133 p.
  • 总页数 133
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号