...
首页> 外文期刊>Psychological assessment >Psychometric Properties of the Coping Inventory for Stressful Situations (CISS) in Patients With Acquired Brain Injury
【24h】

Psychometric Properties of the Coping Inventory for Stressful Situations (CISS) in Patients With Acquired Brain Injury

机译:获得性脑损伤患者应对应激状况的量表(CISS)的心理计量学特性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Information on the psychometric properties of the Coping Inventory for Stressful Situations (CISS) in acquired brain injury (ABI) is currently unavailable. Therefore, we investigated the construct and discriminant, convergent, and divergent validity of the CISS in a Dutch adult sample with newly ABI (N = 139). Patients were recruited at the start of outpatient neurorehabilitation (time since diagnosis ≤ 4 months) or after discharge home from hospital or inpatient neurorehabilitation. The original 3-factor solution of the CISS (Task-Oriented, Emotion-Oriented, Avoidance) showed a borderline fit, which slightly improved after removal of 3 problematic items. We found borderline support for a 4-factor model. Internal consistency was good. Discriminant validity was only partial as we found a moderate correlation between the Task-Oriented and Avoidance scales. Emotion-Oriented Coping correlated strongly with the anxiety and depression subscale of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Of the 2 scales of the Assimilative/Accommodative Coping Questionnaire, Tenacious Goal Pursuit correlated strongest with Task-Oriented Coping, whereas Flexible Goal Adjustment correlated negatively with Emotion-Oriented Coping. In summary, the psychometric properties of the CISS in patients with ABI ranged from acceptable to good. The classical 3-factor structure is appropriate, but some items might be problematic in patients with ABI. Replication of the restricted 3-factor model in larger samples is needed, together with further exploration of discriminant validity and the relationship of the CISS with other coping measures, but for now we recommend using the original CISS in patients with ABI.
机译:目前尚无法获得有关获得性脑损伤(ABI)的应激情况应对清单(CISS)的心理计量学特性的信息。因此,我们调查了在具有新ABI(N = 139)的荷兰成人样本中,CISS的结构和判别,收敛和不同的有效性。在门诊神经康复治疗开始之日(自诊断开始≤4个月)或在出院或住院神经康复治疗后招募患者。 CISS的原始三要素解决方案(任务导向,情感导向,回避)显示出边界拟合度,在删除3个有问题的项目后,其略有改善。我们发现边界支持4因子模型。内部一致性很好。判别效度仅是部分的,因为我们发现“任务导向”量表和“回避”量表之间存在适度的相关性。情绪化的应对与医院焦虑和抑郁量表的焦虑和抑郁量表密切相关。在同化/适应性应对问卷的2个量表中,顽强的目标追求与面向任务的应对最相关,而灵活的目标调整与面向情感的应对负相关。总而言之,CISS在ABI患者中的心理测度范围从可接受到良好。经典的三因素结构是适当的,但某些项目可能对ABI患者有问题。需要在更大的样本中复制限制性三因素模型,并进一步探索判别效度以及CISS与其他应对措施的关系,但目前我们建议在ABI患者中使用原始CISS。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号