首页> 外文学位 >Higher education attorneys' perceptions regarding academic freedom and challenges to academic freedom.
【24h】

Higher education attorneys' perceptions regarding academic freedom and challenges to academic freedom.

机译:高等教育律师对学术自由和对学术自由的挑战的看法。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Higher education attorneys have emerged in recent years as integral participants in the decision and policymaking processes within American higher education institutions. The perceptions of higher education attorneys regarding academic freedom, including professorial, institutional, and student academic freedom, may significantly impact how higher education institutions respond to modern challenges to such freedom. Key challenges to academic freedom as identified in the literature were categorized into four groups for this study (a) judicial or governmental challenges, (b) internal or collegial challenges, (c) institutional challenges, and (d) outside or extra-institutional challenges.; An Internet-based survey was sent to higher education attorneys who subscribed to the National Association of College and University Attorneys' list serve. The survey included questions regarding the attorneys' (a) personal demographics, (b) institutional characteristics, (c) personal and professional experiences with academic freedom, (d) legal offices' roles and responsibilities related to academic freedom disputes, (e) perceptions regarding professorial, institutional, and student academic freedom, and (f) perceptions regarding the four groups of academic freedom challenges listed above. Responses from 179 attorneys nationwide revealed considerable support among higher education attorneys for professorial, institutional, and student academic freedom. Higher education attorneys' perceptions differed significantly based on many of the personal demographics and institutional characteristics explored in the survey, particularly as to the attorneys' professional and institutional experience with academic freedom issues or disputes. However, attorneys' perceptions regarding the three groups of academic freedom did not differ based on age, years of higher education legal experience, or whether their institution was public or private.; Moreover, although this study confirmed the existence of many challenges to academic freedom, it also confirmed that, overall, not all campuses are experiencing significant (or the same) challenges to academic freedom. Additionally, higher education attorneys considered themselves to have adequate resources to keep themselves current on academic freedom issues, and they perceived their institutional administrators as well prepared to address academic freedom issues on their campuses.
机译:近年来,高等教育律师已经成为美国高等教育机构决策和决策过程中不可或缺的参与者。高等教育律师对学术自由的看法,包括教授,机构和学生的学术自由,可能会极大地影响高等教育机构如何应对这种自由的现代挑战。文献中确定的学术自由面临的主要挑战分为四类:(a)司法或政府挑战,(b)内部或学院挑战,(c)体制挑战,和(d)外部或体制外挑战。;一项基于互联网的调查已发送给订阅全国大学和大学律师协会名单服务的高等教育律师。该调查包括以下问题:律师的(a)个人统计数据,(b)机构特征,(c)具有学术自由的个人和专业经验,(d)律师事务所与学术自由纠纷有关的角色和责任,(e)看法关于教授,机构和学生的学术自由,以及(f)对上述四类学术自由挑战的看法。全国有179位律师的回应表明,高等教育律师为教授,机构和学生的学术自由提供了相当多的支持。基于调查中探讨的许多个人人口统计和机构特征,尤其是关于律师在学术自由问题或纠纷方面的专业和机构经验,高等教育律师的看法差异很大。但是,律师对三类学术自由的看法并没有因年龄,高等教育法律经验的年限,或者他们的机构是公立还是私立而有所不同。此外,尽管这项研究证实了对学术自由的诸多挑战,但它也证实,总的来说,并非所有校园都面临着对学术自由的重大(或相同)挑战。此外,高等教育律师认为自己有足够的资源来保持自己在学术自由问题上的最新动态,他们认为自己的机构管理者已做好准备在其校园中解决学术自由问题。

著录项

  • 作者

    Rupe, Manuel R.;

  • 作者单位

    Western Michigan University.;

  • 授予单位 Western Michigan University.;
  • 学科 Education Higher.; Law.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2005
  • 页码 221 p.
  • 总页数 221
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 高等教育;法律;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:41:51

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号