首页> 外文会议>International conference of World Association for Sustainable Development >NEOLIBERALISM IN EDUCATION: HOW PMS UNDERMINED EMPLOYEE MOTIVATION AND ACADEMIC FREEDOM AT THE UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA
【24h】

NEOLIBERALISM IN EDUCATION: HOW PMS UNDERMINED EMPLOYEE MOTIVATION AND ACADEMIC FREEDOM AT THE UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA

机译:教育中的网络自由主义:PMS如何破坏博茨瓦纳大学的员工动机和学术自由

获取原文

摘要

Purpose - This paper examines the implementation of Performance Management System (PMS) at the University of Botswana and its impact on worker's motivation. PMS was inspired by the New Public Management (NPM) doctrine emphasising efficiency. Design/methodology/approach - An exploratory methodology was used, combined with critical realism explaining the dynamics of forced change in relation to academic staff performance. Interviews were conducted to solicit views of staff in four different departments. Findings - Our findings show that PMS has failed to enhance performance and motivate staff. Instead of supporting the university's vision of promoting excellence and academic freedom, it created an environment of punishment, fear and demotivation. Originality/value - Change involving performance management is complex and contested. Established PMS models in the private sector might fail in an academic setting, as different factors shape staff performance, and academic freedom is imperative.
机译:目的-本文研究了博茨瓦纳大学绩效管理系统(PMS)的实施情况及其对工人动机的影响。 PMS受到强调效率的新公共管理(NPM)原则的启发。设计/方法/方法-使用了一种探索性方法,并结合了批判性的现实主义,解释了与学术人员绩效有关的强迫变动的动力。进行了访谈,以征求四个不同部门工作人员的意见。调查结果-我们的调查结果表明PMS未能提高绩效和激励员工。它没有支持大学的追求卓越和学术自由的愿景,而是创造了一种惩罚,恐惧和动力不足的环境。原创性/价值-涉及绩效管理的变更非常复杂且存在争议。在私人机构中建立的PMS模型在学术环境中可能会失败,因为不同的因素会影响员工的绩效,并且必须具有学术自由。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号