首页> 外文会议>International conference of World Association for Sustainable Development >NEOLIBERALISM IN EDUCATION: HOW PMS UNDERMINED EMPLOYEE MOTIVATION AND ACADEMIC FREEDOM AT THE UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA
【24h】

NEOLIBERALISM IN EDUCATION: HOW PMS UNDERMINED EMPLOYEE MOTIVATION AND ACADEMIC FREEDOM AT THE UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA

机译:教育中的新自由主义:PMS如何破坏博茨瓦纳大学的员工动机和学术自由

获取原文

摘要

Purpose - This paper examines the implementation of Performance Management System (PMS) at the University of Botswana and its impact on worker's motivation. PMS was inspired by the New Public Management (NPM) doctrine emphasising efficiency. Design/methodology/approach - An exploratory methodology was used, combined with critical realism explaining the dynamics of forced change in relation to academic staff performance. Interviews were conducted to solicit views of staff in four different departments. Findings - Our findings show that PMS has failed to enhance performance and motivate staff. Instead of supporting the university's vision of promoting excellence and academic freedom, it created an environment of punishment, fear and demotivation. Originality/value - Change involving performance management is complex and contested. Established PMS models in the private sector might fail in an academic setting, as different factors shape staff performance, and academic freedom is imperative.
机译:目的 - 本文介绍了博茨瓦纳大学绩效管理系统(PMS)的实施及其对工人动机的影响。 PMS受到新的公共管理(NPM)教义强调效率的启发。设计/方法/方法 - 使用探索方法,结合关键的现实主义,解释了与学术人员表现相关的强制变化的动态。采访是在四个不同部门征求工作人员的意见。调查结果 - 我们的研究结果表明,PMS未能增强性能和激励员工。它不是支持大学对促进卓越和学术自由的愿景,而是创造了惩罚,恐惧和失败的环境。涉及绩效管理的原创性/值 - 变化是复杂和竞争的。私营部门的PMS模型可能在学术环境中失败,因为不同的因素塑造员工表现,以及学术自由是必要的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号