首页> 外文学位 >An Investigation of the Internal Corporate Factors of Organizational Learning and Innovation.
【24h】

An Investigation of the Internal Corporate Factors of Organizational Learning and Innovation.

机译:组织学习和创新的内部公司因素调查。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This study answers the question, "What are the dimensions of the organizational learning experience?" from the perspective of 35 members of four leading companies, representing the first such empirical effort. A review of over 1,368 articles revealed that current organizational learning models are based in theory rather than practice, frequently reduce organizational learning to the individual level, and focus on external factors to the neglect of internal factors. While research on organizational learning dates back to work by Cyert and March (1963), fifty years later, empirical answers to the following questions were still lacking: •What happens to information as it is processed through the organization? •What predictable screening biases are there in an organization? •What is the relation between decisions made by the responsible representatives and the final decision implemented by the organization? •In what systematic ways are decisions elaborated and changed by the organization? (Cyert & March, 1963, p. 21--22).;Fifty dominant organizational learning survey instruments were closely reviewed. It was discovered that each instrument was based on theoretical models, rather than real-world organizational data. This meant that it was unknown whether any dimensions of organizational learning had been missed, or if the assumed dimensions were correct.;Questions for the interview were drawn from questions that appeared in multiple previous instruments and focused on the organizational rather than individual level. Data was recorded and transcribed verbatim. Scrubbed transcripts were analyzed in Nvivo using a grounded theory approach.;This study found no evidence for several assumed dimensions such as decision types, decision proactivity, role clarity, knowledge turnover, and market share. It was determined that the long-standing idea of controlling for industry is not practical.;Finally, this study discovered that organizational learning is significantly influenced by company culture, which constitutes a way of being. This culture shapes what actions a company takes in areas of knowledge management, client focus, focus for growth, and engagement. What a company does ultimately influences what a company becomes, through organizational learning.;keywords: organizational learning, learning organizations, decision making, epistemology, perception, organizational myopia, sensemaking, innovation.
机译:这项研究回答了以下问题:“组织学习经验的维度是什么?”从四家领先公司的35名成员的角度来看,这是第一个这样的实证研究。对超过1,368篇文章的评论显示,当前的组织学习模型是基于理论而非实践的,经常将组织学习减少到个人层面,并且关注外部因素而忽略内部因素。尽管有关组织学习的研究可以追溯到Cyert和March(1963)的工作,但五十年后,仍然缺乏以下问题的经验性答案:•通过组织处理的信息会发生什么? •组织中存在哪些可预测的筛选偏见? •负责代表做出的决定与组织执行的最终决定之间有什么关系? •组织以何种系统方式制定和更改决策? (Cyert和March,1963年,第21--22页)。;对50种主要的组织学习调查工具进行了仔细的审查。结果发现,每种工具都是基于理论模型,而不是真实的组织数据。这意味着未知组织学习的任何维度是否被遗漏,或者假设的维度是否正确。访谈的问题来自先前多个工具中出现的问题,这些问题侧重于组织而非个人层面。记录数据并逐字记录。在Nvivo中使用扎根的理论方法分析了笔录的成绩单;该研究未发现任何假设维度的证据,例如决策类型,决策主动性,角色明确性,知识周转率和市场份额。最终确定了行业控制的长期观念是不切实际的。最后,本研究发现组织学习受到公司文化的显着影响,而公司文化构成了一种存在的方式。这种文化决定了公司在知识管理,客户关注,增长关注和参与方面采取的行动。公司的行为最终会通过组织学习来影响公司的发展。关键词:组织学习,学习组织,决策,认识论,知觉,组织近视,感官,创新。

著录项

  • 作者

    Jayanti, Elizabeth Bechtel.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Minnesota.;

  • 授予单位 University of Minnesota.;
  • 学科 Organizational behavior.;Organization theory.;Management.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2013
  • 页码 233 p.
  • 总页数 233
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号