首页> 外文学位 >'Everything again will be great and mighty': How the counterculture shaped and influenced current environmental thought.
【24h】

'Everything again will be great and mighty': How the counterculture shaped and influenced current environmental thought.

机译:“一切都会变得伟大而强大”:反对文化如何塑造和影响当前的环境思想。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In this study I look at an aspect of the postwar American counterculture of the 1950s and 1960s that is sometimes overlooked: the environmental movement. I propose that it was the postwar counterculture that helped to develop a more pragmatic and interdisciplinary environmentalism, one that shaped the current environmental movement. The ultimate goal of this study is to investigate the evolution of environmental awareness and environmental activism from a countercultural movement led by marginalized figures and groups in the 1950s, '60s and early '70s to a movement embraced by the mainstream in the later part of the 20th and early 21st centuries, and to answer the questions: How did counterculture writers and thinkers---by way of literature, social and political activism, philosophy---make the shift into the mainstream possible for an environmental consciousness? How has each social and cultural iteration led into the next so environmentalism could become mainstream? Where do we see countercultural thought in present society and where is it absent? Where does this study fit in the environmental conversation of 21st century environmentalism?;The interdisciplinary approach that I investigate involves a shift from the approach to environmentalism seen in the John Muir/Gifford Pinchot debate to one that situates itself in the emerging industrial and economic landscape of postwar America. In essence, the interdisciplinary approach is a shift (but not an abandonment) from a Romantic view of environmentalism to a more pragmatic approach. In the Introduction, I use the works of environmental writers and philosophers, among them Arne Naess, Harold Fromm, Cheryl Glotfelty, and Lawrence Buell, to provide a foundation for my analysis of counterculture literature, philosophy, and activism. In Chapter I, I use the poetry of Gary Snyder and Charles Olson to analyze how ecopoetry can restore and foster a new environmental awareness and consciousness in society and culture, while at the same time offering an anti-industrial, anti-development, and anti-corporate critique. Chapter II looks at the influence of the Beat Generation, including Gary Snyder's influence, on countercultural environmental thought. I consider the works of Allen Ginsberg, Jack Kerouac, and others, to illustrate how the inclusion of environmental themes and imagery in their literature can spread an environmental message from the fringes of society to mainstream culture.;Chapter III looks at the most significant time for the emergence of a new, more pragmatic approach environmentalism, the 1960s. Through a look at prominent figures, such as Murray Bookchin, Rachel Carson, and Stewart Brand, the interdisciplinary approach to environmentalism broadens. Murray Bookchin connected environmentalism to politics and social critique in his "ecological anarchism." Rachel Carson, both a creative writer and a scientist, used the latter position to spread an environmental message, one rooted in scientific inquiry and research. Stewart Brand positioned environmentalism in the marketplace with the publication of the Whole Earth Catalog , ultimately developing a niche for sustainability in the American economy. Chapter IV offers an analysis of Edward Abbey as counterculture writer and environmentalist. I investigate Abbey's ability to forge a new awareness with respect to environmental and philosophical thought, and his influence on radical environmentalism, notably environmental activist groups like Earth First!
机译:在这项研究中,我研究了1950年代和1960年代战后美国反文化的一个方面,它有时被忽视:环境运动。我认为,正是战后反文化推动了更加务实和跨学科的环保主义的发展,从而形成了当前的环境运动。这项研究的最终目的是调查环境意识和环境行动主义从1950年代,60年代和70年代初的边缘化人物和群体领导的反文化运动到后来的主流所拥护的运动的演变。 20世纪和21世纪初,并回答以下问题:反文化的作家和思想家-如何通过文学,社会和政治行动主义,哲学-使向环保的主流转变成为可能?社会和文化的每一次迭代如何导致下一次环保主义成为主流?在当今社会,我们在哪里看到反文化思想?在哪里?这项研究在21世纪环保主义的环境对话中适合什么地方?;我研究的跨学科方法涉及从约翰·缪尔(John Muir)/吉福德·皮钦特(Gifford Pinchot)辩论中看到的环保主义方法的转变到一种适应新兴工业和经济环境的方法。战后的美国从本质上讲,跨学科的方法是从浪漫主义的环保主义观点转向更为务实的方法(但不是放弃)。在引言中,我使用了环境作家和哲学家的作品,包括阿内·内斯,哈罗德·弗洛姆,谢丽尔·格洛特菲蒂和劳伦斯·比尔,为我对反文化文学,哲学和行动主义的分析提供了基础。在第一章中,我使用加里·斯奈德和查尔斯·奥尔森的诗歌来分析生态诗歌如何在社会和文化中恢复和培育新的环境意识和意识,同时提供反工业,反发展和反腐的思想。 -企业评论。第二章探讨了节拍一代对反文化环境思想的影响,包括加里·斯奈德的影响。我考虑艾伦·金斯伯格(Allen Ginsberg),杰克·凯鲁亚克(Jack Kerouac)等人的作品,以说明在他们的文学作品中包含环境主题和意象如何将环境信息从社会边缘传播到主流文化。第三章是最有意义的时期1960年代出现了一种新的,更务实的环保主义。通过查看著名人物,例如穆雷·布钦(Murray Bookchin),瑞秋·卡森(Rachel Carson)和斯图尔特·布兰德(Stewart Brand),跨学科的环保主义方法得以拓宽。默里·布钦(Murray Bookchin)在他的“生态无政府主义”中将环保主义与政治和社会批评联系起来。瑞秋·卡森(Rachel Carson)既是创意作家又是科学家,他利用后者的立场来传播环境信息,这一信息植根于科学探究和研究。斯图尔特·布兰德(Stewart Brand)通过出版《整个地球目录》(Whole Earth Catalog)将环保主义定位于市场,最终为美国经济的可持续性发展奠定了利基。第四章对爱德华·艾比(Edward Abbey)作为反文化作家和环境保护主义者进行了分析。我研究了Abbey在环境和哲学思想方面树立新的意识的能力,以及他对激进的环保主义的影响,尤其是像Earth First这样的环保主义者。

著录项

  • 作者

    Baratta, Chris.;

  • 作者单位

    State University of New York at Binghamton.;

  • 授予单位 State University of New York at Binghamton.;
  • 学科 Literature American.;American Studies.;Environmental Philosophy.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2013
  • 页码 250 p.
  • 总页数 250
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 水产、渔业;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:41:43

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号