首页> 外文学位 >A comparative study of lustration in Central and Eastern Europe.
【24h】

A comparative study of lustration in Central and Eastern Europe.

机译:中欧和东欧的照明比较研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The dissertation examines transitional justice mechanisms implemented in post-communist Central and Eastern Europe. The question of how to deal with the legacies of communist repression has been an important source of political divisions in the region. The post-communist states of Central and Eastern Europe had an array of choices to consider when addressing demands for retrospective justice: from criminal prosecution of important officials, to restitution of property, or declassifying of secret files for public inspection. The two most common paths taken in the region have consisted of lustration laws and the decisions surrounding public access to secret police files. Lustration laws involve the disqualification of certain categories of former communist officials and secret police collaborators from public positions under the new regime.;The dissertation explores differences in lustration laws and access to secret files across four cases that represent variation along a spectrum of outcomes: the Czech Republic having the strongest type of lustration, Poland and Hungary having a weaker form, and Romania lacking institutionalized lustration. The extant literature has focused on instances where such laws have been instituted, but has little to say about cases where it failed. The dissertation pays special attention to the case of Romania, with the goal of explaining its failure to enact lustration in spite of repeated attempts.;The analysis is organized in two main sections. The first evaluates the existing patterns of lustration in the region. The second offers an in-depth analysis of the understudied case of Romania with the intent of filling the vacant niche in the existing literature. Primary sources examined include the proposed projects of lustration laws, the final drafts of laws, parliamentary debates and media reports on the issue. The dissertation concludes that differences in lustration patterns can be fully explained only by simultaneously considering the impact of several factors: the pervasiveness of security apparatus during the last phase of communist rule, the type of regime change, and the extent to which political actors embraced the lustration agenda.
机译:本文研究了在后共产主义中欧和东欧实施的过渡司法机制。如何应对共产主义镇压的遗留问题一直是该地区政治分歧的重要根源。在解决对追溯司法的要求时,中欧和东欧的后共产主义国家有多种选择可以考虑:从对重要官员的刑事起诉到财产归还,或将机密文件解密以供公众检查。该地区采取的两种最常见的途径包括照明法和围绕公众获取秘密警察档案的决定。禁淫法涉及在新政权下取消某些类别的前共产主义官员和秘密警察合作者的公共职务的资格。论文探讨了四种情况下的禁毒法和获取秘密文件的差异,这四个案例代表着一系列结果的变化:捷克共和国的月经类型最强,波兰和匈牙利的月经类型较弱,罗马尼亚缺乏制度化的月经。现有文献集中在已制定此类法律的实例上,但是对于失败的案例却无话可说。论文特别关注了罗马尼亚的情况,目的是解释尽管反复尝试,罗马尼亚仍未表现出光泽的情况。该分析分为两个主要部分。首先评估该地区现有的照明模式。第二部分提供了对罗马尼亚未充分研究的案例的深入分析,目的是填补现有文献中的空白。审查的主要资料包括拟议的淫荡法项目,法律最终草案,议会辩论和有关此问题的媒体报道。论文的结论是,只有同时考虑以下几个因素的影响,才能完全解释不同的上流方式:在共产主义统治的最后阶段,安全机构的普遍性,政权更迭的类型以及政治行为者在多大程度上接受了这一因素。提神议程。

著录项

  • 作者

    Maierean, Andreea Raluca.;

  • 作者单位

    Boston University.;

  • 授予单位 Boston University.;
  • 学科 European studies.;Political science.;East European studies.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2013
  • 页码 190 p.
  • 总页数 190
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号