首页> 外文学位 >Is my instructor there for me? A study of reflective practice and student perceptions of online teaching presence
【24h】

Is my instructor there for me? A study of reflective practice and student perceptions of online teaching presence

机译:我的老师在那吗?关于反思性实践和学生对在线教学存在感的研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

As online education continues to expand, colleges are demanding faculty to keep up with the pace and add new online classes. Oftentimes, online instructors rush the course creation process by focusing more on the course content than creating a sense of human presence in the virtual online community of learners. It was theorized that by simply placing content on a website and expecting students to learn without guided facilitation of reflective practice activities was not the most effective way to invoke critical thinking skills in students. The research question was "Is there a statistically significant difference between students' perceptions regarding the perceived levels of online teaching presence for an instructor who assigns reflective practice activities (lead-in prompts) and an instructor who does not assign reflective practice activities?" The study was a correlational study conducted at a small Northern California community college. Five sections of online courses received the intervention of a reflective lead-in prompt activity within the public discussion area of Blackboard, and four control- group sections did not. The study specifically investigated the students' perceived levels of online teaching presence after being asked to reflect upon their learning during the course. The study helped to bridge the gap in knowledge regarding college students' perceptions about an online instructor that used reflective practice activities in online courses and a relationship to an online instructor's teaching presence. It was confirmed that students in the online classes where there were reflective practice activities, the perceived levels of an online instructor's teaching presence was statistically significantly higher compared to students in the classes where there were no reflective activities.
机译:随着在线教育的不断发展,大学要求教师们跟上步伐并增加新的在线课程。通常,在线讲师会着重于课程内容,而不是在学习者的虚拟在线社区中营造人为感,从而加快课程创建过程。从理论上讲,仅将内容放置在网站上并期望学生在没有引导性的反思性练习活动指导的情况下进行学习,并不是激发学生批判性思维技能的最有效方法。研究问题是“对于分配反思性练习活动(导入提示)的教师和不分配反思性练习活动的教师,学生对在线教学存在感的感知上的统计差异是否显着?”该研究是在北加州一所小型社区大学进行的一项相关研究。在线课程的五个部分在Blackboard的公共讨论区内接受了反思性的引导提示活动的干预,而四个对照组则没有。在要求学生反思他们在课程中的学习后,该研究专门调查了学生对在线教学存在感的感知程度。这项研究有助于弥合关于大学生对在线讲师的看法的知识差距,这些知识在在线课程中使用反思性练习活动以及与在线讲师的教学现状之间的关系。可以肯定的是,在线课堂上有反思性练习活动的学生,与没有反思性活动的班级学生相比,在线讲师的教学表现的感知水平在统计学上显着更高。

著录项

  • 作者

    Hall, Julie Powell.;

  • 作者单位

    Capella University.;

  • 授予单位 Capella University.;
  • 学科 Educational technology.;Community college education.;Higher education.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2013
  • 页码 149 p.
  • 总页数 149
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号