首页> 外文学位 >Severity rating scale for disciplinary infractions and consequences by Kentucky high school teachers.
【24h】

Severity rating scale for disciplinary infractions and consequences by Kentucky high school teachers.

机译:肯塔基州高中教师针对违纪行为和后果的严重性等级量表。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The purpose of this study was to create a severity rating scale for disciplinary infractions and consequences. The participants used in this dissertation were teachers from 14 high schools in central Kentucky. Using a survey instrument created by the researcher, the study examined high school teachers' perceptions of severity of 67 disciplinary infractions and 21 disciplinary consequences. Participants rated the severity of items using a ten-point Likert-type scale. Exploratory factor analysis grouped the disciplinary infractions and consequences into different factors based on severity.; The results of the exploratory factor analysis loaded 67 disciplinary infractions into 13 different factors and loaded 21 disciplinary consequences into five different factors. The researcher paired each infraction factor with a consequence factor based on the severity of the factors.; The most severe types of infractions included assault of staff, battery on staff, indecent exposure, threatening school personnel, possession/use of drugs, possession of dangerous materials, drug paraphernalia, possession of a weapon, group fights, harassment, threatening students, sexual harassment, indecent acts, bullying, sexual misconduct, assault of a student, behavior that poses a danger to self or others, extortion/blackmail, inappropriate physical contact, and fighting. The most severe types of consequences included expulsion, in-school suspension, alternative education program, and out-of-school suspension.; The least severe types of infractions included misuse of passes, failure to bring in homework/materials, public display of affection (PDA), unauthorized driving/parking, littering, unexcused tardies, missing detention, unexcused absence, dress code violation, demonstrating, tobacco possession, failure to serve work detail, gambling, and misuse of computer/Internet. The least severe types of consequences included detention, parent conference, parent notification, student conference, warning, loss of privilege, and in-class disciplinary action.; The study was limited to mostly rural high schools in central Kentucky. Therefore, the results cannot be generalized to all schools. Further studies should be conducted in other states and in suburban and urban settings.
机译:这项研究的目的是为违纪行为和后果建立严重性等级量表。本文使用的参与者是肯塔基州中部14所中学的老师。使用研究人员创建的调查工具,该研究检查了高中教师对67种违纪违纪行为的严重性和21种违纪后果的认识。参与者使用十点李克特型量表对物品的严重程度进行评分。探索性因素分析根据严重程度将违纪行为和后果分为不同因素。探索性因素分析的结果将67个违纪行为载入13个不同因素,将21个纪律​​后果载入五个不同因素。研究人员根据因素的严重性将每个违规因素与后果因素配对。最严重的违规行为包括殴打员工,殴打员工,暴露不雅,威胁学校工作人员,拥有/使用毒品,拥有危险材料,吸毒用具,拥有武器,团体战斗,骚扰,威胁学生,性行为骚扰,in亵行为,欺凌,性行为不当,对学生的殴打,对自己或他人构成危险的行为,勒索/敲诈,不适当的身体接触和战斗。最严重的后果包括开除,校内停学,替代教育计划和校外停学。最不严重的违规类型包括误用通行证,未带入家庭作业/材料,公开展示情感(PDA),未经授权的驾驶/停车,乱抛垃圾,无故拖延,滞留失踪,无故缺席,违反着装规定,示威,吸烟拥有,未能提供工作细节,赌博以及滥用计算机/互联网。最不严重的后果包括拘留,家长会议,家长通知,学生会议,警告,特权丧失和课堂纪律处分。该研究仅限于肯塔基州中部的大多数农村中学。因此,结果不能推广到所有学校。应该在其他州以及郊区和城市环境中进行进一步的研究。

著录项

  • 作者

    Gibson, David Allen.;

  • 作者单位

    The University of Southern Mississippi.;

  • 授予单位 The University of Southern Mississippi.;
  • 学科 Education Administration.; Education Secondary.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2005
  • 页码 124 p.
  • 总页数 124
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 教育;中等教育;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号