首页> 外文学位 >Rethinking privacy: Privacy as an equality right.
【24h】

Rethinking privacy: Privacy as an equality right.

机译:重新考虑隐私:隐私是一项平等权利。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

As a broad and evanescent concept, opinions differ as to what interests or values the protection of privacy is designed to achieve. At first glance, this unhappy state of affairs appears to arrive from a lack of understanding, or at least consensus, of what core liberty or liberties privacy strives to protect. If we want to protect privacy, the argument goes, then we have to ground it in something other than an inchoate, inarticulate right. The problems with the current conceptions of privacy go beyond simply delineating what kinds of things ought to be private. What is missing, and needed, is a coherent concept of privacy as a right - not whether privacy is valuable, but rather, what is it about privacy that is, or should be, protected. Is privacy a free standing right or is it simply derivative from other more recognizable causes of action. Upon what is privacy grounded? Is this really a liberty issue? The thesis in this essay is that privacy is better conceived of as an equality issue, not a liberty issue. (Abstract shortened by UMI.)
机译:作为一个广泛而e逝的概念,对于旨在实现隐私保护的利益或价值观存在不同意见。乍一看,这种不愉快的状况似乎是由于缺乏对核心自由或隐私保护努力保护的理解,或者至少是共识。如果我们想保护隐私,那么争论就必须以一种先天的,不明确的权利为基础。当前的隐私概念存在的问题超出了简单地描述应将哪些类型的事物私有化。缺失和需要的是作为权利的一贯的隐私概念,不是隐私是否有价值,而是隐私应该保护或应该保护的是什么。隐私是一项独立的权利,还是仅仅是其他可识别的行动原因中的衍生产品。隐私基于什么?这真的是自由问题吗?本文的主题是,最好将隐私视为平等问题,而不是自由问题。 (摘要由UMI缩短。)

著录项

  • 作者

    Bruyer, Richard Bruce.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Alberta (Canada).;

  • 授予单位 University of Alberta (Canada).;
  • 学科 Law.
  • 学位 LL.M.
  • 年度 2005
  • 页码 146 p.
  • 总页数 146
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 法律;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号