首页> 外文学位 >Nursing, society, and health promotion---healing practices: A constructionist historical discourse analysis.
【24h】

Nursing, society, and health promotion---healing practices: A constructionist historical discourse analysis.

机译:护理,社会与健康促进---治疗实践:建构主义历史话语分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The purpose of this discourse analysis of health promotion and healing practices was to describe their functioning historically through practices of governance and risk in the context of neoliberal society. The results portray a constructed subjectivity (identity) among citizens and residents of contemporary society who enact expected health promotion and healing behaviors.;Two series of texts were analyzed from a Foucauldian perspective: the Healthy People series from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; and the series on Uninsurance published by the Institute of Medicine. The findings generated five themes that comprise the reality of current illness care system rationalities:;First, the U.S. illness care system, functioning through technology of insurance or wealth extraction, is dysfunctional as a comprehensive illness care delivery system.;Second, health promotion and healing have been subsumed under illness care---if they are addressed it is only as discrete indices that comprise compliance monitoring.;Third, micro determinants of health (such as behavioral patterns, genetic predispositions, social circumstances, shortfalls in medical care, and environmental exposures), while important, continue to be the single focus of illness care in the U.S. Conversely, macro determinants of health, contingent on macro-level economic and political structures, remain unrecognized as having any bearing on health outcomes. Macro determinants of health frame the configuration of the social infrastructure in which micro determinants of health unfold.;Fourth, neoliberal ideology in the U.S. continues to be the status quo for illness care.;Fifth, constructed health promotion and healing identity for individuals is one of health anomie, a new prudentialism where access to health promotion and healing has to be acquired from outside the venue of illness care.;How can we become different from what we have become? While acknowledging the limitations inherent in this current discourse of heath promotion and healing, other alternatives must be explored for betterment of human health and wellbeing---such as a shift toward "care of the self" or "self care" that encompasses an embodiment of an arche health, a health that moves beyond contemporary illness discourses of mind-body, one that defies society's inscription of our subjectivity.
机译:这篇关于健康促进和康复实践的话语分析的目的是通过新自由主义社会背景下的治理和风险实践来描述它们的历史功能。结果刻画了制定预期健康促进和康复行为的当代社会公民和居民之间的建构性主观性(身份)。从福柯角度分析了两个系列的文本:美国卫生与公共服务部的“健康人”系列;以及医学研究所出版的《不保险》系列。调查结果产生了五个主题,这些主题构成了当前疾病护理系统合理性的现实:首先,美国的疾病护理系统通过保险或财富提取技术起作用,而不能作为全面的疾病护理提供系统发挥作用。治愈已归入疾病护理中-如果得到解决,它仅是构成依从性监测的离散指标;第三,健康的微观决定因素(例如行为模式,遗传易感性,社会状况,医疗保健不足以及环境暴露)虽然很重要,但仍然继续是美国疾病护理的重点。相反,取决于宏观经济和政治结构的宏观健康决定因素仍然被认为与健康结果有关。健康的宏观决定因素构成了健康的微观决定因素在其中展开的社会基础设施的配置。第四,美国的新自由主义意识形态仍然是疾病护理的现状。第五,人为的健康促进和治愈身份是其中之一健康失范症,一种新的审慎主义,必须从疾病护理场所之外获得促进健康和康复的途径;;我们如何与已成为的事物有所不同?在认识到当前有关健康促进和康复的论述中固有的局限性的同时,必须探索其他替代方案以改善人类健康和福祉-例如向体现自我的“自​​我照顾”或“自我照顾”的转变一种古老的健康,一种超越了当代人对身体的疾病论断的健康,它违背了社会对我们主观性的铭记。

著录项

  • 作者

    Ronan, James Patrick.;

  • 作者单位

    The University of Arizona.;

  • 授予单位 The University of Arizona.;
  • 学科 Nursing.;Health care management.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2006
  • 页码 240 p.
  • 总页数 240
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号