首页> 外文学位 >Keeping in Touch: Relationships between Parenting Style, Parent-Child Electronic Communication, and the Developing Autonomy and Adjustment of College Students.
【24h】

Keeping in Touch: Relationships between Parenting Style, Parent-Child Electronic Communication, and the Developing Autonomy and Adjustment of College Students.

机译:保持联系:养育方式,亲子电子沟通与大学生自主发展与适应之间的关系。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Traditionally seen as a time for increasing independence and autonomy, the college experience is often the first major, long-term physical separation from parents (Chickering, 1969; Chickering & Reisser, 1993). For previous generations, living away from home provided conditions for autonomy development partially based on infrequent contact with parents. In contrast, the rapid evolution of communication technology in the recent past allows today's generation of college students to connect to their parents instantly and frequently through a variety of electronic means including cellular phone calls, text messages, emails, video chats, and social media. The current study used self-report data from 180 residential college students at a mid-sized private institution in the southeastern United States to explore parent-child communication patterns as they relate to parenting styles and the development of emotional autonomy and adjustment to college. Emotional autonomy was measured with items from the Emotional Autonomy Scale (EAS; Steinberg & Silverberg, 1986). Following Beyers, Goossens, Van Calster, & Duriez (2005), a separation scale (derived from the EAS subscales of parental deidealization, nondependence on parents, and individuation) was used as a measure of emotional autonomy. Two scales from the Student Adaptation to College Questionnaire (Baker & Siryk, 1989) measured students' academic and social adjustment to college.;Results indicated that, in a given week, students reported an average contact frequency (with both parents combined) of 10.92 cell phone calls, 49.88 text messages, and 6.04 email exchanges. Contact was initiated by students and parents at roughly the same rates, and females had more contact with parents than males, in general. Facebook was more popular than Twitter and Instagram for connecting with parents through social media, and the majority of students felt either neutral or positive about being "Facebook friends" with their parents. Overall, students reported high satisfaction with both the frequency and the quality of communication with their parents. Greater levels of parental closeness significantly predicted higher satisfaction with the parent-child Facebook friendship.;The relationships between the traditional parenting styles of permissive, authoritative, and authoritarian parenting (Baumrind, 1991) were investigated in relation to communication patterns, autonomy, and adjustment. Helicopter parenting was also included as a predictor variable, though it is considered separate from the traditional parenting styles (Padilla-Walker & Nelson, 2012). Results of hierarchical regression analyses indicated that parents' higher scores on authoritarian parenting and helicopter parenting predicted more frequent cell phone contact with parents. Parental closeness also emerged as a significant, positive predictor of frequency of cell phone and total communication. Students who talked on their cell phones more frequently overall (not including parental contacts) tended to talk to their parents more often on the phone, and the same went for texting, as well.;Helicopter parenting also predicted lower emotional autonomy, which was in line with the only previous study of helicopter parenting in emerging adulthood (Padilla-Walker & Nelson, 2012). Surprisingly, authoritative and permissive parenting significantly predicted lower emotional autonomy, while authoritarian parenting was related to greater autonomy. Analyses investigating frequency of cell phone contact with parents as a moderator of this relationship indicated that more frequent phone conversations predicted decreased autonomy when parents were more authoritative. High levels of authoritarian parenting, on the other hand, resulted in higher levels of autonomy regardless of how often students talked on the phone with parents, while high contact with less authoritarian parents predicted decreased autonomy. Frequency of cell phone contact with parents was unrelated to academic and social adjustment to college. Findings are discussed in light of previous research and situated within a framework proposing that technological advances in communication have contributed to lengthening the path to adulthood.
机译:传统上,大学经历通常被视为提高独立性和自主权的时间,这是父母与父母之间的第一次重大的,长期的身体分离(Chickering,1969; Chickering&Reisser,1993)。对于前几代人而言,离家出走为部分自主权的发展提供了条件,这部分是基于与父母的不频繁接触。相反,近来通信技术的飞速发展使当今这一代大学生可以通过各种电子手段,包括蜂窝电话,短信,电子邮件,视频聊天和社交媒体,迅速而频繁地与父母联系。当前的研究使用了美国东南部一家中型私立学校的180名居住在校大学生的自我报告数据,研究了父母与子女的交往方式,因为这些方式与养育方式,情绪自主权的发展以及对大学的适应有关。情绪自主用情绪自主量表(EAS; Steinberg&Silverberg,1986)中的项目进行测量。继Beyers,Goossens,Van Calster和Duriez(2005)之后,使用了分离量表(源自EAS父母对父母的理想化,不依赖父母和个体化的次级量表)来衡量情绪自主性。学生适应大学问卷调查的两个量表(Baker&Siryk,1989)衡量了学生对大学的学术和社会适应情况;结果表明,在给定的一周内,学生报告的平均接触频率(父母双方共同)为10.92。手机通话,49.88条短信和6.04电子邮件交换。学生和父母之间的接触率大致相同,女性与父母的接触通常比男性多。 Facebook通过社交媒体与父母建立联系比Twitter和Instagram受欢迎,大多数学生对与父母成为“ Facebook朋友”感到中立或积极。总体而言,学生对与父母沟通的频率和质量都表示高度满意。父母亲的亲密程度越高,预示着对亲子Facebook友谊的满意度就越高。;研究了传统父母教养方式的宽容,权威和专制父母之间的关系(Baumrind,1991年),涉及沟通方式,自主权和适应性。 。直升机育儿也被视为预测变量,尽管它被认为与传统的育儿方式是分开的(Padilla-Walker&Nelson,2012)。分层回归分析的结果表明,父母在威权育儿和直升飞机育儿方面的得分越高,预示着手机与父母的联系越频繁。父母亲的亲密关系也成为手机频率和总体沟通的重要积极指标。总体上讲使用手机通话的学生(不包括父母之间的往来)倾向于在电话上与父母交谈的频率也更高,发短信时也是如此。直升机育儿也预示着较低的情绪自主性,这是因为与先前有关新兴成人中直升飞机育儿的唯一研究一致(Padilla-Walker和Nelson,2012年)。出人意料的是,权威性和宽容性的育儿显着预测了较低的情绪自主性,而威权主义的育儿与较高的自主性有关。分析手机与父母之间的联系作为这种关系的主持人的频率表明,当父母更加权威时,更频繁的电话交谈会预示着自主权的降低。另一方面,无论学生与父母通电话的频率如何,高水平的威权育儿都会导致较高的自主权,而与较少威权父母的频繁接触预示着自主权的降低。手机与父母的联系频率与大学的学业和社会适应能力无关。研究结果将根据先前的研究进行讨论,并位于一个框架中,该框架表明通信技术的进步有助于延长通往成年的道路。

著录项

  • 作者

    Golonka, Megan M.;

  • 作者单位

    Duke University.;

  • 授予单位 Duke University.;
  • 学科 Psychology Clinical.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2013
  • 页码 193 p.
  • 总页数 193
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号