首页> 外文学位 >Trials and tribulations of ancient starch research: An investigation of contamination and earth ovens at Fort Hood, Texas.
【24h】

Trials and tribulations of ancient starch research: An investigation of contamination and earth ovens at Fort Hood, Texas.

机译:古代淀粉研究的试验和磨难:德克萨斯州胡德堡污染和土炉的调查。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Historically, earth ovens have been used to provide direct evidence of ancient plant use through the recovery of charred macrobotanical remains and indirectly by means of experimental archaeology and the ethnographic record. Experiments suggest that direct evidence of ancient starch-rich plant use can be obtained through the recovery of starch granules deposited on fire-cracked-rock (FCR) during cooking episodes even in regions where macrobotanical remains are scarcely preserved. Starch contamination, however, can enter into the archaeological record providing "background noise." Therefore, this study analyzes the results of the Paluxy Sand Geophyte Project to determine if archaeological starch (starch that is both cultural and ancient in origin) can be differentiated from contamination using FCR recovered from heating elements in well-preserved earth ovens at Fort Hood, Texas.;FCR, non-cultural rock control samples (RCS), and air control samples (ACS) were processed and analyzed from 27 earth ovens at 6 sites. Contamination control measures were used, including the use of a clean bench, powder-free latex gloves, washing samples prior to processing, spot sampling, and comparisons between starch granule assemblages recovered from FCR and control samples. Laboratory and field equipment were processed and analyzed for contamination. Only one feature (Feature 4 from 41CV984) yielded starch granules that are unambiguously archaeological in origin, rather than the result of contamination, whereas starch assemblages from the other sites could be archaeological or contamination in origin. Small sample sizes, differential preservation, and/or the cooking of non-starch-rich plants could account for the lack of differences between FCR and RCS samples. Finally, maize (Zea mays) starch granules were recovered from all sample types suggesting that maize starch, most likely from "powder-free" gloves and air-fall is a significant source of starch contamination.
机译:从历史上看,土炉曾通过回收烧焦的大植物残骸而直接提供了古代植物使用的证据,并通过实验考古学和人种志记录间接地提供了证据。实验表明,即使在几乎没有保存大植物残留物的地区,也可以通过在烹饪过程中回收沉积在火裂岩(FCR)上的淀粉颗粒来获得古老的富含淀粉植物的使用的直接证据。但是,淀粉污染会进入考古记录并提供“背景噪音”。因此,这项研究分析了Paluxy Sand Geophyte项目的结果,以确定是否可以使用从胡德堡堡保存完好的土炉中加热元件回收的FCR将考古淀粉(起源于文化和古代的淀粉)与污染区分开来,从6个地点的27个土炉中处理和分析了FCR,非文化性岩石控制样品(RCS)和空气控制样品(ACS)。使用了污染控制措施,包括使用干净的工作台,无粉乳胶手套,在加工前洗涤样品,现场采样以及从FCR和对照样品中回收的淀粉颗粒组合之间的比较。对实验室和现场设备进行了处理并分析了污染物。只有一个特征(41CV984的特征4)产生的淀粉颗粒明确地起源于考古学,而不是污染的结果,而来自其他地点的淀粉组合物可能是考古学或起源污染。小样本量,差异保存和/或非淀粉类植物的蒸煮可解释FCR和RCS样本之间缺乏差异的原因。最后,从所有样品类型中回收了玉米(Zea mays)淀粉颗粒,这表明玉米淀粉(很可能来自“无粉”手套和空气掉落)是淀粉污染的重要来源。

著录项

  • 作者

    Laurence, Andrew Robert.;

  • 作者单位

    Texas A&M University.;

  • 授予单位 Texas A&M University.;
  • 学科 Anthropology Archaeology.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2013
  • 页码 235 p.
  • 总页数 235
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号