首页> 外文学位 >Learning to be writers: Similarities and differences in first graders' processes and products.
【24h】

Learning to be writers: Similarities and differences in first graders' processes and products.

机译:学会当作家:一年级学生的过程和产品的异同。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

For today's students, learning to be writers is a fundamental component of literacy development beginning early in their school careers (Calkins, 1994; Clay, 1979); yet, learning to write is more than transferring ideas to print text. Teachers' beliefs, socio-cultural differences, and complex classroom interactions may all contribute to differences in developing writers.; This study describes the development of first-grade students' writing during a classroom's designated writing period. The focus was on the explicit and implicit similarities and differences in students' writing processes and products in a classroom where all students were expected to be writers. It was important to observe the range of both writing behaviors and written products of students. It was also valuable to observe the classroom writing environment, instruction, and student-teacher interactions. Samples from both teacher-proofread and non-teacher-proofread writing were described.; Hypotheses generated from this study were: (a) Students use writing to document their interests, activities, and possessions with socio-economically and culturally privileged students focusing on descriptions of their coveted possessions and pleasurable experiences and less privileged students focusing on family responsibilities and interactions; (b) As writers develop audience awareness, students differentiate their production of teacher-proofread and non-proofread texts with non-proofread writing becoming increasingly perfunctory with redundant expressions of passive compliance; (c) Writers mix conventional and approximate spelling, punctuation, and capitalization as they focus on sharing personally significant content with writing tasks and teacher scaffolds influencing students' transition to conventional print formats; (d) Students participate differentially in the writing environment with socio-economic, socio-cultural, and learning differences contributing to how workshop participants interact and how students are perceived in a community of writers; (e) Teacher beliefs about valued writing formats and behaviors are paramount determining instruction, formatting tasks, shaping classroom interactions, and, at times, influencing implementation of researchers' ideas and district curricula guidelines.; Research is needed to explore professional development models that promote critical thinking about professional practice. Additional research suggestions include exploring the efficacy of small group guided writing, personal journals, and writing assessments.
机译:对于当今的学生来说,学习成为作家是他们在学校职业生涯初期就开始的读写能力发展的基本组成部分(Calkins,1994; Clay,1979)。然而,学习写作不仅仅是将思想转移到打印文本上。教师的信仰,社会文化差异和复杂的课堂互动都可能导致发展中作家的差异。这项研究描述了在教室指定写作期间一年级学生写作的发展。重点是在希望所有学生都是作家的教室中,学生在写作过程和产品上的显式和隐式相似性和差异。重要的是要观察学生的写作行为和书面产品的范围。观察教室的写作环境,指导和学生与老师的互动也很有价值。描述了来自教师校对阅读和非教师校对阅读的样本。这项研究产生的假设是:(a)学生使用书写来记录他们的兴趣,活动和财产,其社会经济和文化特权学生侧重于对他们梦vet以求的财产和愉快经历的描述,而特权较弱的学生则侧重于家庭责任和互动; (b)随着作家逐渐提高听众的意识,学生将其校对阅读和非校对文本的制作与众不同,而非校对写作则变得越来越敷衍了事,并出现了被动遵守的多余表达; (c)作家混合使用常规和近似的拼写,标点和大写字母,因为他们专注于与写作任务和教师支架共享个人重要内容,从而影响学生向传统印刷格式的过渡; (d)学生在写作环境中的参与差异很大,社会经济,社会文化和学习差异导致讲习班参与者如何互动以及在作家社区中如何看待学生; (e)教师对于有价值的写作格式和行为的信念是决定教学,格式化任务,塑造课堂互动的关键,有时甚至会影响研究人员的思想和地区课程指南的实施。需要进行研究以探索能够促进对专业实践进行批判性思考的专业发展模型。其他研究建议包括探索小组指导的写作,个人期刊和写作评估的功效。

著录项

  • 作者

    Ferreri, Anita Jane.;

  • 作者单位

    Fordham University.;

  • 授予单位 Fordham University.;
  • 学科 Education Elementary.; Education Reading.; Education Language and Literature.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2006
  • 页码 287 p.
  • 总页数 287
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 初等教育;教育;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号