首页> 外文学位 >Trauma and memory in W. G. Sebald's 'Austerlitz' and Guenter Grass's 'Im Krebsgang'.
【24h】

Trauma and memory in W. G. Sebald's 'Austerlitz' and Guenter Grass's 'Im Krebsgang'.

机译:W. G. Sebald的“ Austerlitz”和Guenter Grass的“ Im Krebsgang”中的创伤和记忆。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This thesis analyzes Gunter Grass's Im Krebsgang (2002), and W. G. Sebald's Austerlitz (2001) with regard to trauma and memory. It will be argued that both texts call for a working through of Holocaust guilt, i.e. for the traumatic events of World War II, to be remembered, whereby Im Krebsgang makes aware of the problems resulting from private memories being transmitted or becoming public without contextualisation, whereas Sebald's text shows that private memories of Jewish victims are lacking in the public, but can help Germans to come to terms with their past. Using Dominick LaCapra's concept of trauma, the thesis's first chapter will discuss the nature of trauma dealt with in the the two texts. Im Krebsgang focuses on the trauma of German suffering that has not been worked through. Instead it has been transmitted from the war generation to the following two, for which the student generation of 1968 is being blamed. Their repression of German suffering, combined with their stress on German guilt, results in a dangerous battle for the interpretation of the German Nazi past in the generation of the grandchildren. Austerlitz deals with the Jewish character Austerlitz who is traumatized by the Holocaust and has forgotten all of his childhood memories, which come back, however, as the repressed. Both texts, and as the second chapter will show, can be placed within the context of a current German memory contest. In Im Krebsgang this contest is apparent in the opposition between private memory that stresses suffering, and public memory focusing on guilt. Trying to make private memory public, however, can have negative consequences, if it is not made clear that German suffering is the result of German perpetration. In Austerlitz the memory contest becomes apparent in the inability of public monuments and archives to remember and convey the impact of the Holocaust, which can only be done by private memories in the act of communication.
机译:本文分析了甘特·格拉斯(Gunter Grass)的Im Krebsgang(2002)和W. G. Sebald的Austerlitz(2001)关于创伤和记忆的问题。将会争辩说,这两个文本都呼吁人们度过大屠杀的罪恶感,即要记住第二次世界大战的创伤事件,从而使Im Krebsgang意识到私人记忆在没有情境化的情况下被传播或公开所引起的问题,而塞伯德的文字显示,公众对犹太受害者的私人记忆不足,但可以帮助德国人适应过去。本文的第一章将使用多米尼克·拉卡普拉(Dominick LaCapra)的创伤概念,讨论这两本书中涉及的创伤性质。林·克雷布斯冈(Im Krebsgang)专注于德国痛苦的创伤,这一创伤尚未得到解决。取而代之的是,它已经从战争一代传到了随后的两个时代,这归咎于1968年的学生时代。他们对德国人苦难的镇压,加上对德国人内stress的压力,导致在解释孙子孙辈时对德国纳粹过去的解释进行了一场危险的战斗。奥斯特里茨(Austerlitz)与犹太人物奥斯特里茨(Austerlitz)交往,后者因大屠杀而受了创伤,并忘记了他所有的童年记忆,然而随着压抑的来临,这种记忆又回来了。这两本书以及第二章将要介绍的内容都可以放在当前德国记忆大赛的背景下。在克雷布斯冈(Im Krebsgang),这场争夺明显体现在强调痛苦的私人记忆与注重罪恶感的公共记忆之间。但是,如果尚不清楚德国人的苦难是德国行径的结果,那么试图公开私人记忆可能会带来负面后果。在奥斯特里茨(Austerlitz),记忆竞赛因公共纪念碑和档案馆无法记住和传达大屠杀的影响而变得明显,这只能由私人记忆来进行。

著录项

  • 作者

    Rehmer, Gregor John.;

  • 作者单位

    University of South Carolina.;

  • 授予单位 University of South Carolina.;
  • 学科 Literature Modern.;Literature Germanic.
  • 学位 M.A.
  • 年度 2010
  • 页码 96 p.
  • 总页数 96
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号