首页> 外文学位 >Analyse des pratiques de lecture sur livres electroniques chez les etudiants universitaires.
【24h】

Analyse des pratiques de lecture sur livres electroniques chez les etudiants universitaires.

机译:对大学生电子书阅读实践的分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Electronic reading is taking an increasing place in the total reading space of students. Although the first e-reading systems, commonly called electronic books or e-books, have been existing for several years, opinions about their potential still diverge. A great variety of electronic scholarly content is now offered to students, and this involves a multiplication of uses as well as a variety of reading modes. E-reading systems are now an integral part of the electronic environment to which students have access and need to be studied in greater depth. Many experiments have been conducted in public libraries and academic libraries on electronic books. Research was undertaken on their usability and the degree of readers' satisfaction in order to improve their design. However, few studies have tackled the reading practices of scholars (in particular students) and their perceptions of these new reading systems. Our research focuses on these aspects by studying two different e-reading systems, the Tablet PC (portable device) and a Web-books system, NetLibrary (reading interface integrated into a Web navigator).; Our research investigates the reading practices of students on electronic books. It is guided by three research questions: (1) students' reading strategies (before, during and after reading), (2) elements of the e-reading system which influence (positively or negatively) the reading process, and (3) students' perceptions of the electronic book technology and its potential contribution to their scholarly work. For this research, a mixed-method approach was chosen, using three modes of data collection: a questionnaire, semi-structured interviews with students having used one e-reading system, and the capture of reading traces (annotations, highlights, etc.) left by students in the systems, after use. Respondents in our study (n=46) were students at the Universite de Montreal, from three departments (Library & information sciences, Communications and Linguistics & translation). About half of them (n=21) were interviewed. Furthermore, reading traces left by students in the e-reading systems were analysed. Data from interviews and answers to open questions of the questionnaire were subjected to content analysis, while data from the closed questions of the questionnaire were summarized statistically.; Our results show that, generally, the reading goal, the type and structure of the text, student's reading practices and functionalities of the e-reading system are the elements which determine and orient the choice and use of reading strategies. Helps and barriers for the reading process were identified for each of the two e-reading systems under study. Help mostly consists in elements of the paper book metaphor in the electronic reading environment (delimited page, pagination, etc.), the integrated dictionary, and the fact that e-reading systems facilitate text skimming. As for the barriers, reading instrumentation seems to affect text appropriation by the reader. Moreover, the electronic reading (eg. "on screen") involved lack of concentration and visual tiredness, particularly with NetLibrary. Both the Tablet PC and NetLibrary were considered easy to use, although not always comfortable, discomfort with NetLibrary being more manifest. Students believe that the two e-reading systems are practical tools for their academic work, although for various reasons, specific to each reading system. Overall evaluation of the e-reading experience by respondents was judged positive for the Tablet PC, and somewhat mitigated for NetLibrary.; This research contributes to the knowledge on: (1) electronic reading, in particular that of student readers, and (2) the impact of a reading system on reading effectiveness, on readers, on the achievement of a reading goal, and on reading strategies used. In addition to the limits of this study, suggestions for future research are presented.; Keywords: electronic reading, electronic books, e-books, e-readin
机译:电子阅读在学生的总阅读空间中的地位越来越重要。尽管第一个电子阅读系统(通常称为电子书或电子书)已经存在了数年,但对其潜力的看法仍存在分歧。现在向学生提供了各种各样的电子学术内容,这涉及用途的多样化以及多种阅读模式。现在,电子阅读系统已成为电子环境不可或缺的一部分,学生可以进入电子环境并需要进行更深入的研究。在公共图书馆和大学图书馆中已经进行了许多有关电子书的实验。为了改善设计,对他们的可用性和读者的满意度进行了研究。但是,很少有研究解决学者(特别是学生)的阅读习惯以及他们对这些新阅读系统的看法。我们通过研究两个不同的电子阅读系统Tablet PC(便携式设备)和Web书籍系统NetLibrary(集成到Web导航器中的阅读界面)来研究这些方面。我们的研究调查学生在电子书上的阅读习惯。它由三个研究问题指导:(1)学生的阅读策略(阅读之前,期间和之后),(2)电子阅读系统的要素(对正或负影响),以及(3)学生对电子书技术的理解及其对他们学术工作的潜在贡献。对于本研究,选择了一种混合方法,使用三种数据收集方式:问卷调查,使用一个电子阅读系统的学生的半结构化访谈以及阅读痕迹(注释,重点内容等)的捕获。使用后由学生留在系统中。我们的研究对象(n = 46)是蒙特利尔大学的三个系(图书馆与信息科学,传播和语言学与翻译)的学生。他们中约有一半(n = 21)接受了采访。此外,还分析了学生在电子阅读系统中留下的阅读痕迹。访谈的内容和对问卷未解决问题的回答均经过内容分析,而问卷对未回答问题的数据进行了统计汇总。我们的结果表明,总体而言,阅读目标,课文的类型和结构,学生的阅读习惯以及电子阅读系统的功能是决定和确定阅读策略选择和使用的要素。对于正在研究的两个电子阅读系统中的每一个,都确定了阅读过程的帮助和障碍。帮助主要包括电子阅读环境中纸质书隐喻的元素(分隔页面,分页等),集成词典以及电子阅读系统促进文本浏览的事实。至于障碍,阅读工具似乎会影响读者对文本的占用。此外,电子阅读(例如“在屏幕上”)涉及到注意力不集中和视觉疲劳,特别是对于NetLibrary。尽管并不总是很舒适,但平板电脑和NetLibrary都被认为易于使用,但NetLibrary的不适感更加明显。学生们认为,尽管出于各种原因,这两种电子阅读系统是他们各自学术工作的实用工具,但每种阅读系统都具有特定的用途。回答者对平板电脑的电子阅读体验进行了总体评价,认为对于平板电脑是积极的,对于NetLibrary则有所缓解。这项研究有助于以下方面的知识:(1)电子阅读,特别是学生阅读器的阅读,以及(2)阅读系统对阅读效果,阅读器,阅读目标的实现以及阅读策略的影响用过的。除了本研究的局限性之外,还提出了对未来研究的建议。关键字:电子阅读,电子书,电子书,电子阅读

著录项

  • 作者

    Gharbi, Zeineb.;

  • 作者单位

    Universite de Montreal (Canada).;

  • 授予单位 Universite de Montreal (Canada).;
  • 学科 Information Science.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2006
  • 页码 202 p.
  • 总页数 202
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 信息与知识传播;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:40:31

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号