首页> 外文学位 >The dilemma of guidance in scientific inquiry teaching.
【24h】

The dilemma of guidance in scientific inquiry teaching.

机译:科学探究教学中的指导困境。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The dilemma of guidance is a universal predicament that lies at the core of teaching. That is, teachers must simultaneously allow students to explore and learn on their own, while making sure that students' efforts result in the particular understandings that we want them to learn. The space between is occupied by some level of guidance provided by the teacher to support students' learning; yet the nature of that guidance remains unknown for many teachers. This study is a mixed-method, multiple case study that explores the guidance four teachers provided their students during discussions in scientific inquiry investigations.; The scientific inquiry reform movement has been around for over 40 years, and has shown positive impact on student learning; however, present descriptions of scientific inquiry teaching are vague and have led to large variations in how teachers actually implement this method in their classrooms. Through a review of literature on the role of discourse in classrooms, I developed a collection of strategies that are indicative of more or less guidance provided by the teacher during discussions. I then applied this framework in a larger study that examined the impact of formative assessment on teacher's teaching a middle school, physical science unit on sinking and floating that helps students develop a relative-density based, universal explanation for sinking and floating. From the 12 teachers who were trained to use this curriculum the larger study, I selected four for this dissertation. Two of these teachers had students who showed higher learning gains from pre- to posttests of student learning, while the other two teachers' students showed lower learning gains.; This dissertation used three sources of data---videotapes of classroom discussions, teacher interviews, and measures of student learning---to explore the nature of guidance and its relationship to student learning. The four teachers' lessons were examined and their whole-class discussions were identified; these discussions were then segmented and coded according to the directedness of guidance provided by the teacher and the level of conceptual understanding evident in the discourse. The resulting coding summaries were paired with teacher interviews and used to triangulate propositions about each teacher's pattern of guidance. In addition, students' learning was measured at four points through the unit to determine the state of students' explanations of sinking and floating.; The findings of this study revealed large differences in the guidance teachers provided students during the unit. Teachers whose students showed lower gains in learning exhibited patterns of alternating between high and low levels of guidance. The teachers whose students showed higher gains had more mixed patterns of guidance. The results suggested that the teachers whose students had higher gains illustrated more instructionally responsive teaching, and took an active role to move students toward learning goals, whereas the lower-gain classes received little meaningful guidance from teachers. Measures of student learning indicated teacher effects. This dissertation suggests that current descriptions of scientific inquiry teaching have led to interpretations of the method that do not acknowledge the vital role of the teacher in actively guiding students to reach learning goals.
机译:指导的困境是普遍困境,它是教学的核心。也就是说,教师必须同时允许学生自己探索和学习,同时确保学生的努力导致我们要他们学习的特殊理解。两者之间的空间被老师为支持学生学习提供的某种程度的指导所占据;但是该指导的性质对于许多教师来说仍然未知。该研究是一个混合方法,多案例研究,探讨了四位教师在科学探究调查的讨论过程中为学生提供的指导。科学探究改革运动已经开展了40多年,对学生的学习产生了积极的影响。然而,目前对科学探究教学的描述是模糊的,并导致教师在课堂上实际实施这种方法的方式发生了很大的变化。通过回顾有关话语在课堂上的作用的文献,我制定了一系列策略,这些策略或多或少地表明了教师在讨论中提供的指导。然后,我在一个更大的研究中应用了该框架,该研究考察了形成性评估对教师,中学物理科学课对下沉和漂浮的影响,这有助于学生针对沉没和漂浮制定基于相对密度的通用解释。从12名接受过使用本课程的教师中,我选出了4名。其中两名教师的学生从学生学习的前测到后测中显示出较高的学习收益,而其他两名教师的学生则表现出较低的学习收益。本文利用三种数据来源-课堂讨论录像带,教师访谈和学生学习测度-来探索指导的性质及其与学生学习的关系。检查了四位老师的课程,确定了全班讨论;然后,根据老师提供的指导性指导和话语中明显的概念理解水平,对这些讨论进行细分和编码。由此产生的编码摘要与教师访谈配对,并用于对有关每个教师指导模式的命题进行三角划分。另外,通过该单元在四个点对学生的学习进行了测量,以确定学生对下沉和漂浮的解释的状态。这项研究的结果表明,教师在单元中为学生提供的指导方面存在很大差异。学生学习成绩较低的教师表现出高低指导水平交替的模式。学生学习成绩较高的老师的指导方式更为混杂。结果表明,具有较高学习成绩的教师说明了更具教学响应性的教学,并在使学生朝学习目标迈进方面发挥了积极作用,而低收入课程却没有得到老师的有意义的指导。学生学习的措施表明了教师的影响。本文认为,当前对科学探究教学的描述导致对这种方法的解释并没有认识到教师在积极引导学生达到学习目标中的重要作用。

著录项

  • 作者

    Furtak, Erin Marie.;

  • 作者单位

    Stanford University.;

  • 授予单位 Stanford University.;
  • 学科 Education Secondary.; Education Sciences.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2006
  • 页码 389 p.
  • 总页数 389
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 中等教育;自然科学教育与普及;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:40:26

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号