首页> 外文学位 >Tricksters in Gottfried's 'Tristan': Literature as deception.
【24h】

Tricksters in Gottfried's 'Tristan': Literature as deception.

机译:戈特弗里德的《特里斯坦》中的骗子:文学作为欺骗。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This dissertation analyzes the Tristan of Gottfried von Strassburg (written ca. 1210) in the light of recent theory concerning the trickster figure as discussed in anthropology, ethnography, mythology, and comparative literature. Tricksters and trickery abound in world literature, yet, with few notable exceptions, scholarly literature has neglected to treat Tristan and others in Gottfried's text as tricksters except in the most cursory of terms. I seek to unite the theory of the trickster with the already flourishing discussion on guile, List, as Tristan's chief means of serving King Marke's court and of deceiving the king in his illicit affair with Isolde, with the goal of examining how trickster theory can contribute to medieval literary studies and vice versa. At the heart of Tristan's trickery is a fundamental ambiguity: it benefits and brings honor to Marke while at the same time it deceives him, eventually with devastating effect. An artist of verbal trickery, Tristan figures as the most prominent trickster, managing with stratagems, riddles, double entendres and simple lies to dupe all who would keep him from Isolde. Yet Tristan is a polymath, excelling at music, poetry, hunting, and knightly pursuits as well as courtly manners. His verbal trickery expresses itself in his preoccupation with foreign language, literature and rhetoric, some of many skills he learned at an early age. Analyzing both Gottfried's prologue and the surprising contention that Tristan's literary education amount to the hero's banishment from freedom, I argue that Gottfried builds a structure of poetological reflection within the text that regards literature, and ultimately itself, as instruments of trickery. As Gottfried's fragment approaches its end, however, Tristan finds himself the victim of his own trickery, as even all the rhetorical prowess he can muster cannot spare him the torment of his own zwiwel, or oscillation, as he confronts his attraction to a new Isolde, Isolde of the White Hands.
机译:本文根据人类学,人种学,神话学和比较文学中有关骗子形象的最新理论,分析了戈特弗里德·冯·斯特拉斯堡的特里斯坦(写于1210年)。在世界文学中,骗子和骗术比比皆是,但是,除了极少数粗略的用语外,学术文献已忽略了特里斯坦和戈特弗里德著作中的其他东西,除少数值得注意的例外外,学术文献已被忽略。我试图将骗子的理论与对贵族,李斯特(List)的热烈讨论结合起来,作为Tristan的主要手段,即服务于Marke国王的法庭并欺骗国王与Isolde的婚外情,目的是研究骗子的理论如何做出贡献到中世纪文学研究,反之亦然。特里斯坦(Tristan)骗术的核心是一个基本的模棱两可:它使Marke受益并带来荣誉,同时欺骗Marke,最终产生毁灭性的影响。特里斯坦(Tristan)是口头欺骗的艺术家,他是最杰出的骗子,以谋杀,谜语,双重诱惑和简单的谎言管理,欺骗所有使他远离伊索尔德的人。然而,特里斯坦(Tristan)是一个博大精深的人,在音乐,诗歌,狩猎,骑士追求以及礼节礼仪方面表现卓越。他的言语欺骗手段体现在他对外语,文学和修辞学的专注,这是他从小就学到的许多技能。通过分析戈特弗里德的序言和特里斯坦的文学教育等同于英雄摆脱自由的令人惊讶的论点,我认为戈特弗里德在文本中建立了一种诗学反思的结构,该结构将文学,并最终将其本身视为欺骗手段。然而,当戈特弗里德的片段接近尾声时,特里斯坦发现自己已成为自己骗术的受害者,因为即使他能召集的所有修辞技巧也无法免于他遭受自己的zwiwel折磨或振荡,因为他正面临着对新Isolde的吸引力。 ,白手伊索尔德。

著录项

  • 作者单位

    University of Virginia.;

  • 授予单位 University of Virginia.;
  • 学科 German literature.;Comparative literature.;Medieval literature.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2007
  • 页码 152 p.
  • 总页数 152
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:40:10

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号