首页> 外文学位 >Statistical consequences of attribute misspecification in the Rule Space Model.
【24h】

Statistical consequences of attribute misspecification in the Rule Space Model.

机译:规则空间模型中属性错误指定的统计结果。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Psychometric models for cognitive diagnosis are designed to infer an examinee's abilities on certain attributes, meaning the specific skills, knowledge, and cognitive processes needed to solve particular test items correctly. In order to apply these cognitive diagnostic models, relevant attributes involved in the solution of specific test items must be identified and represented in an incidence matrix, called a Q-matrix. Correct attribute specification is a fundamental step and also predetermines the set of latent classes, termed knowledge states, into which students are classified. The present research examines some statistical consequences of attribute misspecification in the Rule Space model of Tatsuoka (1987, 1990). The current research examines statistical consequences of two types of attribute misspecification in the Rule Space Model. Study 1 examines the statistical consequences of using a misspecified list of attributes arising when either an essential attribute is excluded or a superfluous attribute is included. Study 2 investigates a case where different levels of mastery of an attribute are required to correctly solve particular items. Study 3 considers the effects of attribute exclusion in a Guttman-structured Q-matrix, in which attributes are totally ordered and test items measure a unidimensional ability. In these studies, data are simulated based on ideal response patterns identified by a Q-matrix with added error, so that the simulated responses are aligned with attribute specification in the Q-matrix. Results show that exclusion of an essential attribute generally results in underestimation of examinees' attribute mastery probabilities for the remaining attributes, and inclusion of a superfluous attribute leads to overestimation of examinees' true attribute mastery probabilities. Two factors systematically influencing the consequences across three studies are found to be the number of items that each attribute is involved in and inclusion relations among attributes.
机译:用于认知诊断的心理测量模型旨在推断考生在某些属性上的能力,即正确解决特定测试项目所需的特定技能,知识和认知过程。为了应用这些认知诊断模型,必须识别特定测试项目解决方案中涉及的相关属性,并在称为Q矩阵的发生率矩阵中进行表示。正确的属性说明是基本步骤,并且还预先确定了将学生分类的一组潜在知识类别(称为知识状态)。本文研究了龙冈(1987,1990)的规则空间模型中属性错误指定的一些统计后果。当前的研究检查了规则空间模型中两种类型的属性错误指定的统计结果。研究1检验了当排除必要属性或包括多余属性时使用错误指定的属性列表产生的统计结果。研究2研究了需要对属性进行不同程度的掌握才能正确解决特定项目的情况。研究3考虑了属性排除在古特曼(Guttman)结构的Q矩阵中的影响,其中属性是完全有序的,而测试项目则测量一维能力。在这些研究中,基于由Q矩阵标识的理想响应模式(带有附加误差)对数据进行仿真,以使仿真的响应与Q矩阵中的属性规范对齐。结果表明,基本属性的排除通常会导致低估剩余属性的应试者的属性掌握概率,而多余的属性的包含会导致高估应试者的真实属性掌握概率。系统地影响了三项研究结果的两个因素是每个属性所涉及的项数以及属性之间的包含关系。

著录项

  • 作者

    Im, Seongah.;

  • 作者单位

    Columbia University.;

  • 授予单位 Columbia University.;
  • 学科 Education Tests and Measurements.;Psychology Psychometrics.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2007
  • 页码 97 p.
  • 总页数 97
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号