Social psychological research examining ethnic group differences on national attachment has been mixed. There has been support for group differences such that high status subgroups have higher levels of national attachment than low status subgroups (e.g., see Sidanius, Feshbach, Levin, & Pratto, 1997). Conversely, there has also been evidence for equivalent levels of national attachment across ethnic groups (e.g., see De la Garza, Falcon, & Garcia, 1996; Huo, 2003). This dissertation argues that focusing on ethnic group differences on levels of national attachment does not clarify the psychological conditions which allow groups to have high attachment.;The present research includes three studies that examine the moderation of ethnic group differences on levels of patriotism. In brief, all studies ask whether there are social psychological factors (i.e., group discrimination, status legitimacy, or individual mobility) that clarify when all ethnic groups have high levels of patriotism.;Study one is an experiment that manipulates ethnic group discrimination and examines the impact on levels of patriotism. Participants interacted with confederates who espoused (low or high) discriminatory outgroup attitudes and behaved in a consistent manner toward the participant who was an ethnic outgroup. Findings indicated that participants in the high discrimination condition had lower levels of patriotism than participants in the low discrimination condition.;Study two includes an item-order manipulation in which half of participants are primed with group discrimination prior to answering items about patriotism. The remaining participants respond to items about patriotism and then group discrimination. This study examines whether making salient ethnic group discrimination, for example, beforehand impacts levels of patriotism. Results demonstrated that the item order manipulation worked and had a differential impact on feelings of patriotism as a function of the respondents' ethnic group.;Study three is correlational and examines whether group discrimination, status legitimacy, or individual mobility can moderate ethnic subgroup differences on patriotism. Findings indicate that each of these variables affect levels of patriotism and in some cases interacts with respondent ethnic group membership. This study also examines whether Black respondents have a similar or distinct pattern of findings to Latino and Asian respondents (Sears & Savalei, 2006).
展开▼
机译:研究民族依恋的种族差异的社会心理学研究好坏参半。人们一直支持群体差异,以至于地位高的亚人群比地位低的亚人群具有更高的国家依恋水平(例如,参见Sidanius,Feshbach,Levin和Pratto,1997)。相反,也有证据表明各个民族之间的民族依恋程度相同(例如,参见德拉加萨(De la Garza),猎鹰(Falcon)和加西亚(Garcia),1996年;霍,2003年)。本文认为,关注民族依恋水平上的族群差异并不能阐明允许群体高度依恋的心理条件。本研究包括三项研究,考察了民族差异对爱国主义水平的缓和作用。简而言之,所有研究都询问是否有社会心理因素(即群体歧视,地位合法性或个人流动性)可以澄清何时所有族裔都具有很高的爱国主义水平。研究之一是一项操纵族裔歧视并进行调查的实验对爱国主义水平的影响。参与者与同盟者互动,后者支持(低或高)歧视性的外来群体态度,并以一致的方式对待作为种族外来群体的参与者。研究结果表明,高歧视条件下的参与者比低歧视条件下的参与者爱国主义水平低。研究二包括项目顺序操纵,其中一半参与者在回答有关爱国主义的问题之前先受到了群体歧视。其余参与者回答有关爱国主义和群体歧视的问题。这项研究检查了进行明显的种族歧视是否会事先影响爱国主义水平。结果表明,项目顺序操纵有效并且对爱国主义情感的影响程度与受访者的种族有关。;研究三是相关的,研究了群体歧视,地位合法性或个人流动性是否可以缓解种族子群体之间的差异。爱国主义。研究结果表明,这些变量中的每一个都会影响爱国主义程度,在某些情况下会与受访者的族裔成员互动。这项研究还研究了黑人受访者与拉丁裔和亚洲受访者的调查结果是否相似或不同(Sears&Savalei,2006)。
展开▼