首页> 外文学位 >Consumer Willingness to Pay for Genetically Engineered Edamame.
【24h】

Consumer Willingness to Pay for Genetically Engineered Edamame.

机译:消费者愿意为转基因毛豆付款。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This study examined the effect of GM labeling on consumer willingness to pay (WTP) for edamame. It also investigated how people reacted to different messages and whether the order of receiving positive or negative information about GM technology impacted their willingness to pay (WTP). The study had three components: (1) a sensory test of GM and non-GM labeled products; (2) a non-hypothetical experimental auction to assess WTP for GM, non-GM and unlabeled products; and (3) a questionnaire to collect demographics and other information from the participants. Results of the sensory evaluation revealed no statistically significant difference between GM and non-GM edamame in terms of aroma, taste, appearance, texture and overall impression with GM edamame rated slightly higher in three of the five sensory categories. Despite no differences in these sensory attributes between GM and non-GM edamame, there was a statistically significant and large premium for non-GM edamame over the GM and unlabeled edamame products. Further, WTP for unlabeled and GM edamame were similar suggesting existence of preconceived negative notions about GM edamame. The estimated discounts for GM edamame therefore do not support GM breeding efforts for edamame at this time. Overwhelmingly, negative information about GM technology had a large negative, statistically significant impact on WTP that could not be reversed with smaller positive GM technology information effects on WTP regardless of order of information provided. However, modifying the opinion about GM technology also had a large statistically significant effect on WTP. With responses on knowledge about GM technology suggesting a poor understanding of GM technology, it may well be fruitful to educate consumers to sway their opinion toward greater GM acceptability. Targeting this message to female and younger population demographics was supported as WTP for GM edamame by women was statistically significantly lower than WTP for GM edamame by men. By the same token WTP for GM edamame declined statistically significantly with age suggesting that younger consumers may be more accepting of GM technology than older buyers.
机译:这项研究检查了转基因标签对消费者对毛豆胺的支付意愿(WTP)的影响。它还调查了人们如何对不同的消息做出反应,以及接收有关转基因技术的正面或负面信息的顺序是否影响了他们的支付意愿(WTP)。该研究包括三个部分:(1)对转基因和非转基因标记产品的感官测试; (2)非假设性的实验拍卖,以评估转基因,非转基因和未贴标签产品的WTP; (3)收集参与者的人口统计资料和其他信息的问卷。感官评估的结果显示,在香气,味道,外观,质地和总体印象方面,GM和非GM毛豆之间没有统计学上的显着差异,其中GM毛豆在五个感官类别中的三个中都略高。尽管GM和非GM毛豆之间的感官特性没有差异,但非GM毛豆在统计学上显着且比GM和未标记的毛豆产品具有较大的溢价。此外,未标记的和GM毛豆的WTP相似,表明存在关于GM毛豆的先入为主的负面观念。因此,转基因毛豆的估计折扣目前不支持转基因毛豆的育种工作。绝大多数情况下,关于转基因技术的负面信息对WTP产生了较大的负面影响,在统计上具有重大意义,无论提供的信息顺序如何,如果转基因技术对WTP的影响较小,则无法逆转。但是,修改有关GM技术的观点对WTP也有很大的统计意义。鉴于对转基因技术知识的回答表明对转基因技术的了解不多,因此教育消费者使他们的观点转向提高转基因可接受性可能是富有成果的。支持将此信息针对女性和较年轻的人口统计数据,因为女性的GM毛豆的WTP统计上显着低于男性的GM毛豆的WTP。同样,随着年龄的增长,GM毛豆的WTP在统计上显着下降,这表明年轻消费者比年龄较大的消费者更愿意接受GM技术。

著录项

  • 作者

    Wolfe, Elijah J.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Arkansas.;

  • 授予单位 University of Arkansas.;
  • 学科 Agricultural economics.
  • 学位 M.S.
  • 年度 2016
  • 页码 92 p.
  • 总页数 92
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号