首页> 外文学位 >The effect of group mode and time in course on frequency of teaching, social, and cognitive presence indicators in a community of inquiry.
【24h】

The effect of group mode and time in course on frequency of teaching, social, and cognitive presence indicators in a community of inquiry.

机译:小组模式和课程时间对探究社区中的教学频率,社交和认知存在指标的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Projections call for the proportion of students enrolled in blended courses to outpace the proportion of students in totally online courses in a few years. Yet the literature indicates that we know little about how undergraduates and graduate students learn in blended environments. In addition, few theoretical models have been developed specifically for online or blended learning. One such model is Garrison, Anderson, and Archer's (2000) Community of Inquiry framework. The purpose of this study was to investigate how well the Community of Inquiry model explains discussion interactions among teaching presence, social presence, and cognitive presence over time and in different group modes to produce a worthwhile educational experience. Specifically, an undergraduate/graduate-level inquiry-based course at a large Midwestern university about the philosophical and historical roots of adult education in America was the context of the study. A quantitative content analysis of transcripts from one group ( n = 4) that met via synchronous chats and another group ( n = 5) that met face to face were examined. Statements in the transcripts were transformed to quantitative data for analysis within the framework of a mixed MANOVA design. Results found that group mode had an effect on frequency of social presence and cognitive presence. The face-to-face group generated more than twice the frequency of social presence indicators and nearly three times the frequency of cognitive presence indicators than the online group. There was no difference over time on the frequency of teaching presence, social presence, or cognitive presence for either the online or face-to-face group.
机译:预测要求在几年内参加混合课程的学生比例要超过完全在线课程的学生比例。但是文献表明,我们对大学生和研究生如何在混合环境中学习的知识很少。另外,很少有理论模型专门针对在线或混合学习而开发。这样的模型之一就是Garrison,Anderson和Archer(2000)的社区调查框架。这项研究的目的是调查“探究社区”模型如何很好地解释随着时间的推移以及在不同的小组模式下教学存在,社会存在和认知存在之间的讨论互动,以产生有价值的教育经验。具体而言,本研究的背景是中西部大型大学基于本科/研究生水平的探究性课程,内容涉及美国成人教育的哲学和历史渊源。对来自一组(n = 4)通过同步聊天相遇和另一组(n = 5)面对面相遇的成绩单进行了定量内容分析。成绩单中的陈述被转换成定量数据,以便在混合MANOVA设计的框架内进行分析。结果发现,小组模式对社交存在和认知存在的频率有影响。与在线小组相比,面对面小组产生的社交临场感指标的频率高出两倍多,而认知呈现指标的频率几乎高出三倍。对于在线或面对面小组,在教学,社交或认知上的频率在时间上没有差异。

著录项

  • 作者单位

    The Ohio State University.;

  • 授予单位 The Ohio State University.;
  • 学科 Education Adult and Continuing.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2007
  • 页码 153 p.
  • 总页数 153
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 成人教育、业余教育;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号