首页> 外文学位 >Consuming flesh: The biopolitics of beef consumption.
【24h】

Consuming flesh: The biopolitics of beef consumption.

机译:食用肉:牛肉消费的生物政治学。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This dissertation explores contemporary cultural politics via the optic of beef consumption. Drawing from the work of Michel Foucault, Giorgio Agamben, Bruno Latour and Jacques Derrida, I examine the discursive conditions that both normalize and pathologize the consumption of animal flesh in terms of what resonates as natural, good or ethical consumption, what is considered marginal or fringe, and what is regarded as unethical, unnatural or unhealthy. My interest is how discourses surrounding the health and ethics of flesh consumption articulate with broader regulatory regimes. I focus on beef because of its centrality in North American diets. Beef has recently become the target of health and environmental concerns, in part due to the emergence of vegetarianism as well as animal rights organizations that are calling contemporary agricultural and gastronomic practices into question. Beef is also a salient trade and political issue with recent outbreaks of bovine spongiform encephalopathy (mad cow disease), a fatal disease that can cross the species divide from cattle to humans via flesh consumption.; I propose that underlying the contemporary politics of beef consumption are deeper struggles over the nature of the divide separating humans from animals as well as culture from nature. These boundaries are continuously constructed, maintained and challenged by our beliefs about and accepted practices of flesh consumption (who or what we deem acceptable to eat). They are bound up in the ways in which we categorize eating practices (herbivores, carnivores, vegetarians) and how we respond when these categories are transgressed. To conclude, I explore alternative ways of conceiving an ethics of flesh consumption, one that takes into account our often troubled relations with animal bodies. Following the work of Jacques Derrida, I propose that such an ethics be framed in terms hospitality and conviviality: we never eat entirely on our own because we are inherently in relation with other beings and situated within particular environments, both material and symbolic. This acknowledges and respects the boundaries imposed by the particularities, contingencies and contradictions so intimately bound up with our need to consume other bodies as well as other bodies that need to consume.
机译:本文通过牛肉消费的视角探讨当代文化政治。从米歇尔·福柯(Michel Foucault),乔治·阿甘本(Giorgio Agamben),布鲁诺·拉图尔(Bruno Latour)和雅克·德里达(Jacques Derrida)的著作中,我考察了使自然,良好或道德消费产生共鸣,被认为是边际消费或道德消费的共鸣和正常化的话语条件。边缘,以及被认为是不道德,不自然或不健康的事物。我的兴趣在于围绕肉食健康和道德的论述如何与更广泛的监管制度相结合。由于牛肉在北美饮食中的重要地位,因此我将重点放在牛肉上。牛肉最近已成为人们关注健康和环境的目标,部分原因是素食主义的兴起以及动物权利组织对当代农业和美食实践的质疑。牛肉也是最近发生的牛海绵状脑病(疯牛病)的重要贸易和政治问题,这种致命疾病可以通过肉食从牛到人从牛到人跨越整个物种。我认为,当代牛肉消费的政治基础是对人类与动物,文化与自然的鸿沟进行更深入的斗争。我们对肉食消费(我们认为谁或我们认为可以接受)的信念和接受的做法不断地构建,维护和挑战这些界限。它们与我们对饮食习惯(草食动物,食肉动物,素食主义者)进行分类的方式以及在违反这些类别时我们的反应方式有关。总而言之,我探索了一种关于食用肉的伦理学的替代方法,该方法考虑了我们与动物身体之间经常陷入困境的关系。在雅克·德里达(Jacques Derrida)的工作之后,我建议以招待和欢乐的眼光来构筑这种道德观:我们绝不完全自己吃东西,因为我们天生就与其他人联系在一起,并且处在特定环境中,包括物质和象征意义。这承认并尊重由特殊性,偶然性和矛盾性所强加的界限,这些界限与我们消耗其他物体以及需要消耗的其他物体的需求密切相关。

著录项

  • 作者

    Blue, Gwendolyn G.;

  • 作者单位

    The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.;

  • 授予单位 The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.;
  • 学科 Mass Communications.; Anthropology Cultural.; Canadian Studies.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2006
  • 页码 193 p.
  • 总页数 193
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 传播理论;人类学;人口学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号