首页> 外文学位 >Democracy Dispossessed: Land, Law & the Politics of Redistribution in South Africa.
【24h】

Democracy Dispossessed: Land, Law & the Politics of Redistribution in South Africa.

机译:所论述的民主:南非的土地,法律与再分配政治。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This dissertation concerns the history of land politics in South Africa and, equally, land as a vehicle for understanding the transition from apartheid to the post-apartheid order. In 2004, after a decade in power, the ANC government's failure to carry out widespread land reform began to test the country's democratic possibilities. In the lead up to that year's national election, social movements urged landless people to boycott the polls and occupy land instead as part of a "No Land! No Vote!" campaign. With this clash as its entry point for analysis, this dissertation examines historical factors that have shaped South Africa's neoliberal democracy and prospects for redistribution. It offers insights into some of the most significant questions facing the country: What is the historical relationship between land dispossession, citizenship, and politics in South Africa? And why, well into the Mbeki years, was the country unable, or unwilling, to reckon with it?;Broad in scope, this dissertation examines a number of institutions that shaped the politics of land, economic development, and citizenship in South Africa over the last century. It is particularly focused on period of the 1940s-2004, encompassing the apartheid era and the first ten years of democracy. I begin by recasting the history of apartheid pass laws in the mid-twentieth century, widening the scope beyond their role in containing labor mobility and controlling access to cities. I show how vagrancy laws were one piece of a continuum that stretched through jails and prisons to rural plantations, supplying labor to farms and subsidizing agricultural development. Later chapters examine how, beginning in the 1970s, the World Bank and other international institutions helped shape the contours of land and housing policies and the relationship between states and citizens. My research also shows how, during the apartheid transition and through the Mandela and Mbeki administrations, private prisons and harsh criminal justice reforms became integral parts of neoliberal economic development. This dissertation weaves together the history that has shaped South Africa's 'dispossessed democracy' and concludes with a discussion of the implications for social movements and political change.
机译:本文涉及南非土地政治的历史,同样地,土地作为理解种族隔离制度向后种族隔离制度过渡的媒介。 2004年,在执政十年后,非国大政府未能进行广泛的土地改革,开始检验该国的民主可能性。在那一年的全国大选前夕,社会运动敦促无土地的人抵制民意测验并占领土地,而不是作为“没有土地!不要投票!”的一部分。运动。以此冲突作为分析的切入点,本文考察了影响南非新自由主义民主的历史因素和再分配的前景。它提供了有关该国面临的一些最重要问题的见解:南非的土地占用,公民权和政治之间的历史关系是什么?以及为什么在整个姆贝基(Mbeki)年间,该国无法或不愿与之抗衡?;本文的研究范围广泛,考察了许多影响南非土地,经济发展和公民身份政治的机构上个世纪。它特别关注1940年代至2004年,包括种族隔离时代和民主的头十年。首先,我重述二十世纪中叶的种族隔离通行法的历史,扩大其范围,超越其在限制劳动力流动和控制进入城市方面的作用。我展示了流浪法律是从监狱和监狱延伸到农村种植园,为农场提供劳动力并为农业发展提供补贴的连续过程的一部分。后面的章节研究了从1970年代开始,世界银行和其他国际机构如何帮助塑造土地和住房政策的轮廓以及国家与公民之间的关系。我的研究还表明,在种族隔离过渡期间以及通过曼德拉和姆贝基政府,私人监狱和严厉的刑事司法改革如何成为新自由主义经济发展的组成部分。这篇论文编织了塑造南非“丧失民主”的历史,并在最后讨论了对社会运动和政治变革的影响。

著录项

  • 作者

    Alexander, Amanda.;

  • 作者单位

    Columbia University.;

  • 授予单位 Columbia University.;
  • 学科 African history.;South African studies.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2016
  • 页码 364 p.
  • 总页数 364
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号