首页> 外文学位 >Using an interactive website to disseminate participatory ergonomics research findings: An exploratory study.
【24h】

Using an interactive website to disseminate participatory ergonomics research findings: An exploratory study.

机译:使用交互式网站传播参与式人体工程学研究结果:一项探索性研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Introduction. Researchers traditionally present the results of their research in academic journals and through conference presentations. Typically, individuals working outside of academia do not have access to traditional journal indexes; the use of electronic archives has been shown to assist in disseminating research findings to potential users outside of the research community. Typically the results of participatory ergonomics research are published in peer reviewed articles or presented at conferences. Some health and safety associations have developed and published (in print or on their website) participatory ergonomics literature reviews and participatory ergonomics program implementation manuals with industry specific examples for their members. The Participative Ergonomics Blueprint and Ontario's MSD Prevention Guideline are non-industry specific documents that can be used as resources for a participative ergonomics program.; Currently, there is not an all-in-one resource for workplace parties containing all of the information to consider when determining if a participatory approach to ergonomics is appropriate for a specific workplace, or when implementing a participatory ergonomics program. Workplace parties would have to consult several sources (such as health and safety association publications, academic literature, books, magazines, corporate resources, safety groups, newsgroups, etc.) to gather and synthesize the information and resources required to develop and implement a participatory ergonomics program.; The purpose of this thesis was to evaluate the responses to and effectiveness of an interactive website for knowledge dissemination to industry stakeholders.; Methods. I developed an interactive wiki-style website with content based on my lay language synthesis of the participatory ergonomics literature. Relevant case-study examples, drawn from participatory ergonomics intervention studies, were used to illustrate concepts from the literature review.; Website visitors were asked to complete a short questionnaire and were encouraged to contribute experiences, tools, links and comments on each web page in the "visitor contributed content" area. The purpose of the questionnaire was to learn more about website visitors and to gather feedback about the effectiveness of using an interactive website to disseminate participatory ergonomics research findings to industry stakeholders. Data were collected to allow computation of total duration of website visit, page order, total number of pages viewed, and the average time spent viewing each page. A qualitative analysis of all visitor contributed content and questionnaire responses was completed. The data were reviewed, grouped into themes and key messages were summarized. T-tests and chi-square analyses were completed to analyze the quantitative questionnaire responses.; Results. During the data collection period (October 23, 2006 to May 31, 2007), there were 2214 website visits. With "short duration" and search engine indexing software visitors removed, 256 people came to the website, who browsed the content for more than one minute and viewed more than one page. During this time 54 questionnaires were submitted.; Conclusions. The most significant limitation of this project was the small number of questionnaire respondents and the sparse visitor contributions to the website content which is likely due to not allowing a sufficiently long data collection period. Feedback from website visitors suggests that additional case study examples and a participatory ergonomics "toolbox" should be added to future iterations of the website.; It was surprising that there were no statistically significant differences for the source credibility of the website content based on the literature review, the visitor contributed content and other health, safety and ergonomics information on the Internet.; Most website visitors did not share their experiences due to a reported lack of time an
机译:介绍。传统上,研究人员会在学术期刊上和通过会议演示文稿介绍其研究结果。通常,在学术界以外工作的个人无法访问传统期刊索引;电子档案的使用已被证明有助于将研究结果传播给研究社区之外的潜在用户。通常,参与式人体工程学研究的结果会发表在同行评议的文章中或在会议上发表。一些健康和安全协会已经开发并出版了(以印刷形式或在其网站上)参与式人体工程学文献评论和参与式人体工程学计划实施手册,并为其成员提供了行业示例。参与式人机工程学蓝图和安大略省的MSD预防指南是非行业特定的文档,可以用作参与式人机工程学计划的资源。当前,在确定参与式人机工程学方法是否适合特定工作场所时,或在实施参与式人机工程学计划时,工作场所方没有一个包含所有信息的多合一资源。工作场所各方必须咨询一些资源(例如健康与安全协会的出版物,学术文献,书籍,杂志,公司资源,安全小组,新闻组等),以收集和综合开发和实施参与式活动所需的信息和资源。人体工程学程序。本文的目的是评估对交互式网站进行知识传播给行业利益相关者的反应和有效性。方法。我开发了一个交互式Wiki风格的网站,其内容基于参与式人体工程学文献的通俗易懂的语言。从参与式人体工程学干预研究中提取相关案例研究实例,以说明文献综述中的概念。网站访问者被要求填写一份简短的调查表,并被鼓励在“访问者贡献的内容”区域的每个网页上贡献经验,工具,链接和评论。问卷的目的是了解有关网站访问者的更多信息,并收集有关使用交互式网站向行业利益相关者传播参与式人体工程学研究结果的有效性的反馈。收集数据以计算网站访问的总持续时间,页面顺序,浏览的页面总数以及浏览每个页面所花费的平均时间。对所有访客贡献内容和问卷答复的定性分析已完成。对数据进行了审查,分为主题并总结了关键信息。完成T检验和卡方分析,以分析定量问卷的答复。结果。在数据收集期间(2006年10月23日至2007年5月31日),有2214个网站访问。随着“持续时间短”和搜索引擎索引软件访问者的删除,有256人​​访问了该网站,他们浏览内容超过一分钟,并浏览了一页以上。在这段时间内提交了54份问卷。结论。该项目的最大局限性是问卷调查者人数少,访问者对网站内容的贡献少,这可能是由于不允许足够长的数据收集时间。网站访问者的反馈意见建议,应在网站的未来版本中添加其他案例研究示例和参与式人体工程学“工具箱”。令人惊讶的是,根据文献综述,访问者贡献的内容以及互联网上其他健康,安全和人体工程学信息,网站内容的来源可信度在统计上没有显着差异。由于报告时间不足,大多数网站访问者没有分享他们的经验。

著录项

  • 作者

    Morose, Tanya Elizabeth.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Waterloo (Canada).;

  • 授予单位 University of Waterloo (Canada).;
  • 学科 Health Sciences Recreation.
  • 学位 M.Sc.
  • 年度 2007
  • 页码 128 p.
  • 总页数 128
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 预防医学、卫生学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号