首页> 外文学位 >The pictorial figure in the work of Severo Sarduy.
【24h】

The pictorial figure in the work of Severo Sarduy.

机译:Severo Sarduy工作中的绘画人物。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

My dissertation aims to trace the impact of the plastic arts on the work of Severo Sarduy. Though Sarduy never enjoyed the same level of notoriety as that of other Latin American writers like Garcia Marquez and Vargas-Llosa, and his compatriot, Cabrera-Infante, he, on the other hand never lacked for excellent critical interpretations to his work from critics like Roberto Gonzalez Echevarria, Rene Prieto, Gustavo Guerrero, and other reputable scholars. Missing, however, from what is otherwise an impressive body of critical material, is a study of the importance of painting and architecture firstly on his theory, and secondly on his creative work.;In order to fill this lacuna in Sarduy studies, this dissertation undertakes a critical approach to his essays, Barroco, Escrito sobre un cuerpo, "Barroco y neobarroco," and La simulacion from the stand point of art history. For often forgotten is the fact that the twenty-three year old Sarduy left Cuba for Paris in 1961 not to study literature but art history, where he earned the equivalent of Masters degree from the Ecole du Louvre with a thesis on Roman art. And yet it was the art of the Italian Renaissance (e.g. the paintings as well as the brilliant and numerous treatises on linear perspective produced from the 15th to the 16th century) and what he called the Italian, Spanish, and colonial Baroque or "neo-baroque" aesthetic that interested him and to which he dedicated so many pages.;From the Renaissance and the Baroque he borrowed an interest in the relationship between science, art, and literature, where the language of art was equated with the rhetoric of scientific texts, such as the dialogues of Galileo. This material as well as a tracing of the theoretical texts that Sarduy read during the mid 1960s (by such art historians as Erwin Panofksy, Walter Friedlaender, Arnold Hauser, Hubert Damisch, et al) is covered in Chapter 1 of the dissertation. Chapter 2 pays special attention at the specific figure of the body in Sarduy's theory vis-a-vis painting and architecture, and provides an analysis of his conclusions regarding such diverse artists as Rubens and the Cuban architect, Ricardo Porro. It also examines Sarduy's treatment of the pictorial body in literature through his critical assessments of Giancarlo Marmori's Storia di Vous, Carlos Fuente's Zona Sagrada, and Salvador Elizondo's Farabeuf: looked through the lens of Western European and Eastern aesthetics.;Chapter 3 and Chapter 4 of the dissertation are devoted to a study of the place of the pictorial figure in the creative work. Thus while Chapter 3 is a study of the poetry in Big Bang (1974), and in the Obra completa, in Chapter 4 I turn my attention to the unstudied radio plays ("La Playa," "Los matadores de hormigas," "La caida," "Relato" and "Tanka"). And though references are obviously also made to his prose ( Gestos, Cobra and De donde son los cantantes, El Cristo de la rue Jacob) it is done so primarily to illustrate points of contact. Critical interpretations of the novels are excellent and extensive, and I felt that I could make a greater contribution by analyzing texts that have not received the same critical attention than by treading on familiar ground already explored by very capable critics. In the end, the goal has been to shed some light on an area of Sarduy's thought and writing---namely, the art historical background---in such a way that it will enrich future readings and study of this very culturally rich and important twentieth century writer.
机译:我的论文旨在追溯造型艺术对Severo Sarduy作品的影响。尽管萨都(Sarduy)从未像加西亚·马尔克斯(Garcia Marquez)和瓦尔加斯·洛萨(Vargas-Llosa)以及他的同胞卡布雷拉·英凡特(Cabrera-Infante)那样享有其他拉丁美洲作家那样的臭名昭著,但另一方面,他却从来没有像批评家那样对他的作品做出出色的批判性解释。 Roberto Gonzalez Echevarria,Rene Prieto,Gustavo Guerrero和其他著名学者。然而,从令人印象深刻的关键材料遗漏的方面,首先是对绘画和建筑重要性的研究,首先是在他的理论上,其次是在他的创造性作品上。为了填补萨杜伊研究中的这一空白,本论文从艺术史的角度出发,他对他的论文Barroco,Escrito sobre un cuerpo,“ Barroco y neobarroco”和La simulacion采取了批判性的方法。常常被人遗忘的事实是,二十三岁的萨尔杜(Sarduy)于1961年离开古巴前往巴黎学习文学而不是艺术史,在那里他获得了卢浮宫(Ecole du Louvre)的硕士学位,并获得了罗马艺术博士学位。然而,这是意大利文艺复兴时期的艺术(例如,绘画以及从15世纪到16世纪创作的许多关于线性透视的出色论文),以及他所说的意大利,西班牙和殖民地巴洛克式或“新式巴洛克式的美学使他感兴趣,并为此投入了很多篇幅。;从文艺复兴时期和巴洛克式的建筑中,他借用了对科学,艺术和文学之间关系的兴趣,在这种关系中,艺术语言等同于科学文本的修辞。 ,例如伽利略的对话。论文的第一章介绍了这些材料以及1960年代中期Sarduy阅读的理论著作(由诸如Erwin Panofksy,Walter Friedlaender,Arnold Hauser,Hubert Damisch等人的艺术历史学家)阅读。第2章特别关注了Sarduy相对于绘画和建筑理论中人体的特定形象,并分析了他对鲁本斯和古巴建筑师Ricardo Porro等不同艺术家的结论。本书还通过对西安·杜·马莫里(Giancarlo Marmori)的斯托里亚·迪·沃斯(Storia di Vous),卡洛斯·富恩特(Carlos Fuente)的佐纳·萨格拉达(Zona Sagrada)和萨尔瓦多·埃利佐多(Salvador Elizondo)的法拉博夫(Farabeuf)的批判性评估,考察了萨杜(Sarduy)对文学中绘画主体的处理方式:通过西欧和东方美学的视角进行了观察;第3章和第4章本文致力于研究绘画人物在创作中的地位。因此,尽管第3章是对《大爆炸》(1974年)和《奥布拉全集》中的诗歌的研究,但在第4章中,我将注意力转移到未经研究的广播剧上(“ La Playa”,“ Los matadores de hormigas, caida”,“ Relato”和“ Tanka”)。尽管显然也提到了他的散文(Gestos,Cobra和De donde son los cantantes,El Cristo de la rue J​​acob),但这主要是为了说明接触点。对小说的批判性解释是出色而广泛的,我认为通过分析那些没有受到同样批判性关注的文本,我可以做出更大的贡献,而不是依靠有能力的批评家已经探索的熟悉的领域。最后,我们的目标是阐明萨度的思想和写作领域,即艺术史背景,从而丰富未来的阅读和研究。二十世纪的重要作家。

著录项

  • 作者

    Perez, Rolando.;

  • 作者单位

    City University of New York.;

  • 授予单位 City University of New York.;
  • 学科 Latin American literature.;Caribbean literature.;Art history.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2008
  • 页码 309 p.
  • 总页数 309
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号