声明
1 Introduction
1.1 Background of the Present Study
1.2 Significance, purpose and research methods of the present study
1.3 Corpus source of the present study
2 Literature Review
2.1 Domestic research
2.2 Foreign research
2.3 Summary
3 The Theoretical Framework
3.1 Principle of goal direction
3.2 Relevance theory
4 The Basic Issues of Discourse Markers inCourtroom Question- answer Interaction
4.1 The operational definition of discourse markers in courtroom question-answer interaction
4.2 The features of discourse markers in courtroom question-answer interaction
4.2.1 Detachability
4.2.1 Semantic vacancy
4.2.1 Discourse connectivity
4.3 The pragmatic functions of discourse markers in courtroom question-answer interaction
4.3.1 The metapragmatic functions
4.3.2 The pragmatic-direction function
4.3.3 The pragmatic-constraint function
4.4 The types of discourse markers in courtroom question-answer interaction
4.4.1 Evidential markers
4.4.2 Reformulation markers
4.4.3 Moderated-tone markers
4.4.4 Manner-of-speaking markers
4.4.5 Inferential markers
5 Application of Discourse Markers in the Courtroom Question-answer Interaction Based on the Principle of Goal Direction and Relevance Theory
5.1 Discourse markers in the courtroom question-answer interaction under the three goal relations
5.1.1 The discourse markers of goal conflict
5.1.2 The discourse markers of goal consistence
5.1.3 The discourse markers of goal neutrality
5.2 Pragmatic Functions of Five Types of Discourse Markers in the Courtroom Question-answer Interaction Based on the Relevance Theory
5.2.1 The pragmatic functions of evidential markers
5.2.2 The pragmatic functions of reformulation markers
5.2.3 The pragmatic functions of moderated-tone markers
5.2.4 The pragmatic functions of manner-of-speaking markers
5.2.5 The pragmatic functions of inferential markers
6 Conclusion
6.1 Major findings
6.2 Limitations and suggestions of the study
参考文献
致谢
Appendix
湖北工业大学;
