首页> 外文会议>Videometrics, range imaging, and applications X >Range sensors on marble surfaces: quantitative evaluation of artifacts
【24h】

Range sensors on marble surfaces: quantitative evaluation of artifacts

机译:大理石表面上的距离传感器:伪影的定量评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

While 3D imaging systems are widely available and used, clear statements about the possible influence of material properties over the acquired geometrical data are still rather few. In particular a material very often used in Cultural Heritage is marble, known to give geometrical errors with range sensor technologies and whose entity reported in the literature seems to vary considerably in the different works. In this article a deep investigation with different types of active range sensors used on four types of marble surfaces, has been performed. Two triangulation-based active sensors employing laser stripe and white light pattern projection respectively, and one PW-TOF laser scanner have been used in the experimentation. The analysis gave rather different results for the two categories of instruments. A negligible light penetration came out from the triangulation-based equipment (below 50 microns with the laser stripe and even less with the pattern projection device), while with the TOF system this came out to be two orders of magnitude larger, quantitatively evidencing a source of systematic errors that any surveyor engaged in 3D scanning of Cultural Heritage sites and objects should take into account and correct.
机译:尽管3D成像系统广泛可用,但关于材料特性对所获取的几何数据可能产生的影响的清晰陈述仍然很少。尤其是在文化遗产中经常使用的材料是大理石,众所周知,大理石会因距离传感器技术而产生几何误差,而且在文献中报道的实体在不同的作品中似乎有很大的不同。在本文中,已经对在四种类型的大理石表面上使用的不同类型的有效范围传感器进行了深入研究。实验中使用了两个分别采用激光条纹和白光图案投影的基于三角测量的有源传感器,以及一个PW-TOF激光扫描仪。对于这两类工具,分析得出的结果截然不同。基于三角测量的设备的光透射率可以忽略不计(激光条纹小于50微米,而图案投影设备小于50微米),而TOF系统的透光率要大两个数量级,从数量上证明了光源任何从事文化遗产遗址和物体3D扫描的测量师应考虑并纠正的系统错误。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号