首页> 外文会议>The 2nd International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedical Engineering(iCBBE 2008)(第二届生物信息与生物医学工程国际会议)论文集 >Comparison of Nitrogen Removal in an AN/AO and an AO Submerged Membrane Bioreactor in Treating Bathing Wastewater
【24h】

Comparison of Nitrogen Removal in an AN/AO and an AO Submerged Membrane Bioreactor in Treating Bathing Wastewater

机译:AN / AO和AO潜水膜生物反应器中脱氮处理沐浴废水的比较

获取原文

摘要

Simultaneous nitrification and denitrification (SND) and traditional nitrification and denitrification (TND) were studied in lab-scale and the full-scale submerged membrane bioreactor (MBR) tests for the bathing wastewater treatment under the same condition. As a result, the removal of the nitrogen was not only the contribution of the anoxic (AN) tank, but also the aeration (AO) tank because of its SND effect. From the two tests, it can be drawn that there would be two methods to remove the nitrogen. One was nitrification and denitrification in the AO tank and AN tank, which contributed mainly in nitrogen removal. The other was simultaneous nitrification and denitrification occurred in the AO tank, although its effect was not very significant. The contribution ratios of the two kind's nitrogen removal ways in treating the bathing wastewater were about 70% and 30%, respectively. At the same time, the main pollutions in bathing wastewater such as COD and LAS were also studied systemically in the two scale tests. As a result, there had a good removal (over 95%) to the pollutions, in which the microorganisms played a greater role than membrane.
机译:在实验室规模下进行了同时硝化和反硝化(SND)和传统硝化和反硝化(TND)的研究,并且在相同条件下进行了全规模浸没膜生物反应器(MBR)测试来处理沐浴废水。结果,氮的去除不仅是缺氧(AN)罐的贡献,而且由于其SND效应也是曝气(AO)罐的贡献。从这两个测试中可以得出,将有两种去除氮的方法。一种是在AO槽和AN槽中进行硝化和反硝化,这主要是为了脱氮。另一个是在AO储罐中同时发生硝化和反硝化作用,尽管其效果不是很明显。两种脱氮方式对沐浴废水的处理贡献率分别为70%和30%左右。同时,在两个规模的测试中,还对沐浴废水中的主要污染物(如COD和LAS)进行了系统研究。结果,对污染物的清除效果很好(超过95%),其中微生物起的作用比膜更大。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号