首页> 外文会议>Surface and dermal sampling >Evaluation of Asbestos in Dust on Surfaces by Micro-Vacuum and Wipe Sampling
【24h】

Evaluation of Asbestos in Dust on Surfaces by Micro-Vacuum and Wipe Sampling

机译:微量真空和擦拭取样评估表面灰尘中的石棉

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Micro-vacuum and wipe sampling methods are routinely used to measure surface dust contamination in both occupational and environmental settings. Both methods are subject to variability in their efficiency of dust collection resulting primarily from textural surface characteristics and dust loading. As part of a study to determine contamination levels of asbestos and other World Trade Center related contaminants in the wall cavity of a high-rise office building, paired samples were collected from 15 locations. The surface type of 14 locations was concrete-masonry block; the remaining surface type was a polyvinyl chloride coating. Micro-vacuum wipe pairs were obtained from the same wall component at contiguous locations. A template was used to ensure that equal 100-cm2 areas were consistently sampled. Micro-vacuum and wipe samples were collected and analyzed for asbestos using ASTM Methods D5756 and D6480, respectively. The average surface concentration reported by the micro-vacuum samples was numerically higher than the wipe samples, but the difference was not statistically significant (P= 0.195). Both methods yielded an equal number of samples below the analytical sensitivity; the false-negative rates were the same for each method. Micro-vacuum and wipe sample concentrations were not correlated (P~2 = 0.207). The length and width of asbestos structures collected by wipe samples was significantly larger than by micro-vacuum samples (P= <0.001). Micro-vacuum sampling for asbestos in dust on rough surfaces yields numerically higher concentrations of asbestos. Despite variations in the relative efficiency of particle collection by these methods, the data pairs demonstrate that micro-vacuum and wipe samples produced statistically equivalent results, with micro-vacuum samples being more efficient on the rough surface tested.
机译:在职业和环境条件下,通常使用微量真空和擦拭取样方法来测量表面灰尘污染。两种方法的集尘效率都存在差异,这主要是由于表面纹理特性和粉尘负荷造成的。作为确定高层办公大楼墙腔中石棉和其他与世贸中心相关污染物的污染水平的研究的一部分,从15个地点收集了成对的样品。 14个位置的表面类型为混凝土砌块;其余的表面类型是聚氯乙烯涂层。微真空擦拭对是从连续位置的同一壁组件获得的。使用模板来确保始终如一地对100平方厘米的区域进行采样。收集微量真空和擦拭样品,并分别使用ASTM方法D5756和D6480分析石棉。微量真空样品报告的平均表面浓度在数值上高于擦拭样品,但差异无统计学意义(P = 0.195)。两种方法产生的样品数量均低于分析灵敏度。每种方法的假阴性率相同。微量真空和擦拭样品浓度不相关(P〜2 = 0.207)。擦拭样品收集的石棉结构的长度和宽度显着大于微真空样品收集的石棉结构的长度和宽度(P = <0.001)。在粗糙表面上的尘埃中石棉的微真空采样产生的石棉浓度在数值上更高。尽管通过这些方法收集颗粒的相对效率有所不同,但数据对表明,微真空和擦拭样品产生的统计结果均等,微真空样品在经测试的粗糙表面上的效率更高。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号