首页> 外文OA文献 >Comparison of Wet Wipe vs Micro-Vacuum Sampling Techniques for Determining Concentrations of Asbestos in Surface Dust
【2h】

Comparison of Wet Wipe vs Micro-Vacuum Sampling Techniques for Determining Concentrations of Asbestos in Surface Dust

机译:湿擦拭与微真空采样技术测定表面粉尘中石棉浓度的比较

摘要

The objective of the study was to evaluate the detection efficiency of micro-vacuum surface sampling and surface wet wipe sampling in homes that had been identified with vermiculite attic insulation and/or other asbestos containing materials. Surface samples were collected pre and post weatherization activities and analyzed by transmission electron microscopy. Baseline sampling revealed that wet wipe sampling was more likely to detect surface asbestos contamination than micro-vacuum sampling; 55% of surface wet wipe samples revealed detectable asbestos compared to 17% of micro-vacuum samples. In addition, 16% of the surface wet wipe samples revealed asbestos concentrations above the established background level of 10,000 s/cm² compared with 3% of micro-vacuum samples. Results of this study suggest that surface wet wipe sampling, in accordance with other sampling methods, is recommended for baseline testing to assess potential living space asbestos contamination.
机译:该研究的目的是评估在已通过ver石阁楼绝缘和/或其他含石棉材料鉴定的房屋中的微真空表面采样和表面湿擦拭采样的检测效率。在风化前后,收集表面样品,并通过透射电子显微镜进行分析。基线采样显示,湿擦拭采样比微真空采样更有可能检测到表面石棉污染。 55%的表面湿擦拭样品显示出可检测到的石棉,而微量真空样品则为17%。另外,有16%的表面湿擦拭样品显示出的石棉浓度高于既定的10,000 s /cm²背景水平,而微量真空样品的比例为3%。这项研究的结果表明,建议按照其他采样方法进行表面湿擦拭采样,以进行基线测试,以评估潜在的生活空间石棉污染。

著录项

  • 作者

    Shaw Natalie;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2015
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号