首页> 外文会议>Software engineering and formal methods >A Hazard Analysis Method for Systematic Identification of Safety Requirements for User Interface Software in Medical Devices
【24h】

A Hazard Analysis Method for Systematic Identification of Safety Requirements for User Interface Software in Medical Devices

机译:系统识别医疗设备用户界面软件安全要求的危害分析方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Formal methods technologies have the potential to verify the usability and safety of user interface (UI) software design in medical devices, enabling significant reductions in use errors and consequential safety incidents with such devices. This however depends on comprehensive and verifiable safety requirements to leverage these techniques for detecting and preventing flaws in UI software that can induce use errors. This paper presents a hazard analysis method that extends Leveson's System Theoretic Process Analysis (STPA) with a comprehensive set of causal factor categories, so as to provide developers with clear guidelines for systematic identification of use-related hazards associated with medical devices, their causes embedded in UI software design, and safety requirements for mitigating such hazards. The method is evaluated with a case study on the Gantry-2 radiation therapy system, which demonstrates that (1) as compared to standard STPA, our method allowed us to identify more UI software design issues likely to cause use-related hazards; and (2) the identified UI software design issues facilitated the definition of precise, verifiable safety requirements for UI software, which could be readily formalized in verification tools such as Prototype Verification System (PVS).
机译:正式方法技术具有验证医疗设备中用户界面(UI)软件设计的可用性和安全性的潜力,从而可以大大减少此类设备的使用错误和随之而来的安全事故。但是,这取决于全面和可验证的安全要求,以利用这些技术来检测和预防UI软件中可能引起使用错误的缺陷。本文提出了一种危害​​分析方法,该方法将Leveson的系统理论过程分析(STPA)扩展为一整套因果因素类别,从而为开发人员提供了系统地识别与医疗设备相关的与使用相关的危害及其原因的清晰指南。 UI软件设计中的要求,以及缓解此类危害的安全要求。通过在Gantry-2放射治疗系统上进行的案例研究对该方法进行了评估,结果表明:(1)与标准STPA相比,我们的方法使我们能够识别更多可能导致使用相关危害的UI软件设计问题; (2)识别出的UI软件设计问题促进了UI软件的精确,可验证的安全要求的定义,可以很容易地在诸如原型验证系统(PVS)之类的验证工具中对其进行形式化。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号