首页> 外文会议>Recombination lifetime measurements in silicon >PROBLEMS AND POSSIBILITIES OF COMPARING DIFFERENT LIFETIME MEASURING INSTRUMENTS AND TECHNIQUES
【24h】

PROBLEMS AND POSSIBILITIES OF COMPARING DIFFERENT LIFETIME MEASURING INSTRUMENTS AND TECHNIQUES

机译:比较各种寿命测量仪器和技术的问题和可能性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The scope of the present paper is the understanding of the most important parameters influencing carrier lifetime measurement results. The role of surface conditions and carrier injection levels are discussed in details. Two techniques, μ-PCD and SPV, are compared for the case of some important recombination centers, such as Fe, Cr, Au and Co. Fe and Cr are investigated by both techniques in their single atomic form and also when pairing with dopant boron. It is shown that SPV results are in agreement with the expectations from μ-PCD data when the difference in injection level is taken into account. The capabilities of the two techniques are demonstrated in the case of Fe-B and Cr-B pair dissociation and association processes.
机译:本文的范围是对影响载流子寿命测量结果的最重要参数的理解。详细讨论了表面条件和载流子注入水平的作用。比较了一些重要的重组中心(如Fe,Cr,Au和Co)的两种技术μ-PCD和SPV。两种技术都以单原子形式以及与掺杂硼配对时研究了Fe和Cr。 。结果表明,在考虑进样量差异的情况下,SPV结果与μ-PCD数据的预期结果吻合。在Fe-B和Cr-B对解离和缔合过程中证明了这两种技术的功能。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号