首页> 外文会议>National History and Heritage Congress; 20041020-23; Baltimore,MD(US) >Baltimore's Water Supply 1787-1854 Meeting the Needs of a Growing City
【24h】

Baltimore's Water Supply 1787-1854 Meeting the Needs of a Growing City

机译:巴尔的摩的供水1787-1854满足不断发展的城市的需求

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In retrospect, Baltimore's efforts to provide an adequate supply of water proved to be a long struggle for politicians, engineers and consumers. From its first failed attempts to secure water to its final purchase of the private water rights, the city struggled to gain the needed financial political and popular support for building a water supply. For most of this period, it appeared the municipality could not convince the public of the need for an ample water supply, or it could not convince taxpayers that it was worth the expense to build a municipal system. Baltimore's seemed content with their piecemeal system of wells, springs and pumps. The task of building a piped water supply was left to the privately owned Baltimore Water Company, As the Company later claimed, the job of building the waterworks was given to the private sector by default. With limited financial resources and conservative business leadership, the Water Company expanded its services at a very slow pace. Leaving half of the city without piped water after almost a half century. The dual system of the privately-piped source for a number of wealthy individuals and businesses and a publicly-run system of wells and pumps for the less wealthy appeared to work satisfactorily until the early 1820s. Before the mid-1820s there were no strong voices of dissent or criticism regarding the dual system. The two systems were based upon the ability to pay, to what historian Joel Tarr referred to as a water system based on "class structure." Signs of conflict first appeared in 1803 when Baltimore was growing but only 13% of the population had access to a piped water supply. It took nearly thirty years of negotiations and commissioned studies to unite the two sources, Despite the occasional outbreak of water-related diseases and the frustrations of broken pumps, there appeared to be no great sense of urgency for an improved water system. Public concern over the quality of water, which, today, is a key issue water supply, was virtually nonexistent in this study. Before the 1880s, there was little understanding in America about the treatment and filtration of water. Neither of Baltimore's two sources provided any filtration, although both recognized that polluted water was unappealing to customers. The key issue of expanding the water system was based upon securing an adequate supply for fire protection. This remained the most compelling reason for any improvements to the water system from its first creation in the early 1800s and until the transition from private to public control in the 1850s. Repeatedly, citizens and politicians expressed their concern for adequate water, fire hydrants and pumping capacity to reach the higher elevated portions of the city. This, combined with the growing realization that the Baltimore Water Company had outgrown its original role as the only entity capable of supplying water to the city, moved the two suppliers to unite as one under the governance of the municipality.
机译:回顾过去,巴尔的摩为提供充足水源所做的努力对政客,工程师和消费者来说是长期的斗争。从最初的尝试来获得水的失败尝试到最终购买私人水权,这座城市都在努力获得建设供水所需的财政政治和民众支持。在此期间的大部分时间里,市政当局似乎无法说服公众需要充足的水,或者无法说服纳税人建立市政系统是值得的。巴尔的摩似乎对零碎的水井,泉水和水泵系统感到满意。建设管道供水的任务留给了私有的巴尔的摩自来水公司,正如该公司后来声称的那样,默认情况下,建造自来水厂的工作交给了私营部门。凭借有限的财务资源和保守的业务领导,自来水公司以非常缓慢的速度扩展了服务。半个世纪后,剩下一半的城市没有自来水。直到1820年代初,用于许多富裕个人和企业的私人管道双重系统以及为较贫穷的人们提供的公共井水泵系统似乎都令人满意。在1820年代中期之前,对于双重制度并没有强烈的反对或批评之声。这两个系统都基于支付能力,这是历史学家乔尔·塔尔(Joel Tarr)所说的基于“阶级结构”的供水系统。冲突的迹象最早出现在1803年,当时巴尔的摩正在增长,但只有13%的人口可以使用自来水。花费了近30年的谈判和委托研究来统一这两个来源,尽管偶尔出现与水有关的疾病和泵坏了的挫败感,但似乎对改善水系统没有太大的紧迫感。在今天的研究中,几乎没有公众关注水的质量,而水的质量是当今供水的关键问题。在1880年代之前,美国对水的处理和过滤知之甚少。巴尔的摩的两个来源均未提供任何过滤功能,尽管两者都认识到污水对消费者没有吸引力。扩大供水系统的关键问题是基于确保充足的消防供应。从1800年代初创建水系统到1850年代从私人控制向公共控制过渡之前,这一直是对供水系统进行任何改进的最有说服力的理由。公民和政治人物再三表示对足够的水,消防栓和抽水能力以到达城市较高的高地地区表示关注。加上人们日益认识到巴尔的摩自来水公司已不再是最初的唯一能够向城市供水的实体,这促使两家供应商在市政府的领导下成为一个联合体。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号