首页> 外文会议>Metrology, Inspection, and Process Control for Microlithography XIX pt.2 >Improving STI etch process development by replacing XSEM metrology with scatterometry
【24h】

Improving STI etch process development by replacing XSEM metrology with scatterometry

机译:通过用散射测量法代替XSEM计量来改进STI蚀刻工艺的开发

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

For years, scatterometers have been providing full profile information on line/space arrays. These profiles are often compared to XSEM images in order to show how well they match. This is done by placing the profiles and images next to each other or by overlapping them. The comparisons, however, are typically qualitative; this makes it difficult to determine exactly how good the match is. Furthermore, this qualitative comparison makes it difficult to determine whether profiles from one scatterometry tool or model match corresponding XSEM images better than another tool's or model's profiles. This study circumvents this problem by making multiple measurements of critical dimension, sidewall angle, and height/depth from XSEM images, and then comparing them to scatterometry measurements previously collected from the same locations. The vehicle that is used for this study is a series of etched STI wafers that were subjected to a range of etch processes. Total Measurement Uncertainty (TMU) analysis is used to properly quantify the comparisons. Both scatterometry library and regression models are investigated; the results from both of these methods are compared to the XSEM measurements and to each other. A technique to estimate the accuracy of the XSEM measurements themselves is also used. Results show that, within statistical error, both scatterometry methods provide the same information about the samples. Furthermore, the data reveal that the scatterometer is in most cases about as accurate as the XSEM metrology in quantifying significant structural components of the samples. Finally, examples showing how the increased sampling of scatterometry can be used to improve etch process development is provided.
机译:多年来,散射仪一直在提供关于行/空间阵列的完整配置文件信息。通常将这些配置文件与XSEM图像进行比较,以显示它们的匹配程度。这是通过将配置文件和图像彼此相邻放置或重叠来完成的。但是,这些比较通常是定性的。这使得很难确定确切的匹配程度。此外,这种定性比较使得很难确定一个散射测量工具或模型的轮廓是否比另一个工具或模型的轮廓更好地匹配相应的XSEM图像。这项研究通过对XSEM图像的关键尺寸,侧壁角度和高度/深度进行多次测量,然后将它们与先前从相同位置收集的散射测量结果进行比较,从而规避了此问题。这项研究使用的载体是一系列经过蚀刻的STI晶片,这些晶片经过了一系列蚀刻工艺。总测量不确定度(TMU)分析用于正确量化比较。散射库和回归模型都得到了研究;将这两种方法的结果与XSEM测量结果以及彼此的结果进行比较。还使用一种估算XSEM测量本身准确性的技术。结果表明,在统计误差范围内,两种散射法均提供有关样品的相同信息。此外,数据显示,在大多数情况下,散射仪在量化样品的重要结构成分方面与XSEM度量衡差不多。最后,提供了示例,展示了如何使用增加的散射测量采样来改善蚀刻工艺的发展。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号