首页> 外文会议>Americas conference on information systems >Analyzing Frequent Collaborators in the IS Field: What Can We Learn about IS Coauthorship in General?
【24h】

Analyzing Frequent Collaborators in the IS Field: What Can We Learn about IS Coauthorship in General?

机译:分析常见的合作者在“领域”:我们可以了解哪些人的共同主持?

获取原文

摘要

Despite the longstanding nature of social network theory and its application to research on communication technologies, few IS studies employ social network analysis (SNA) concepts; the few that do are by organizational communication scholars. A recent stream of work by IS scholars is to apply SNA to study research collaboration - although this has mostly focused on individual IS conferences. We analyze frequent coauthors in five IS journals from 1999-2007 to show that most of these frequent coauthors primarily publish with their PhD students (what I label "supervisory coauthorship"). Two-thirds of frequent coauthors with 7 or more distinct partners mostly publish with their former PhD students, while less than one-third mostly publish with peer scholars. Nearly 85% of frequent coauthors were affiliated with North American institutions; two or more were located in the UK, Singapore and Hong Kong. We offer insights about the high rate of coauthorship in IS journals.
机译:尽管社会网络理论的长期性及其对通信技术研究的应用,但很少有研究采用社会网络分析(SNA)概念;少数人是由组织沟通学者。最近的工作流是学者是申请SNA学习研究合作 - 尽管这主要专注于个人是会议。我们分析了五个是1999 - 2007年期刊的频繁的同志,表明,大多数这些频繁的共同主教主要与他们的博士学生发表(我标记“监督成套”)。有7个或更多不同的合作伙伴的三分之二频繁的合作伙伴主要与他们以前的博士学生发表,而不到三分之一主要发表同行学者。近85%的频繁的共同主教是隶属于北美机构;两个或更多位位于英国,新加坡和香港。我们提供了关于中的共同创作率的见解。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号