首页> 外文会议>Americas conference on information systems;AMCIS 2010 >Analyzing Frequent Collaborators in the IS Field: What Can We Learn about IS Coauthorship in General?
【24h】

Analyzing Frequent Collaborators in the IS Field: What Can We Learn about IS Coauthorship in General?

机译:分析IS领域的频繁合作者:总体上我们可以了解IS共同作者的哪些内容?

获取原文

摘要

Despite the longstanding nature of social network theory and its application to research on communication technologies, few IS studies employ social network analysis (SNA) concepts; the few that do are by organizational communication scholars. A recent stream of work by IS scholars is to apply SNA to study research collaboration - although this has mostly focused on individual IS conferences. We analyze frequent coauthors in five IS journals from 1999-2007 to show that most of these frequent coauthors primarily publish with their PhD students (what I label "supervisory coauthorship"). Two-thirds of frequent coauthors with 7 or more distinct partners mostly publish with their former PhD students, while less than one-third mostly publish with peer scholars. Nearly 85% of frequent coauthors were affiliated with North American institutions; two or more were located in the UK, Singapore and Hong Kong. We offer insights about the high rate of coauthorship in IS journals.
机译:尽管社会网络理论及其在通信技术研究中的长期应用性质,但很少有IS研究采用社会网络分析(SNA)概念。很少有组织传播学者来做的。 IS学者最近的工作流是将SNA应用于研究合作研究,尽管这主要集中在单个IS会议上。我们分析了1999-2007年间五种IS期刊中的常任合著者,以显示这些常任合著者中的大多数主要是与他们的博士生一起发表的(我称之为“监督合著者”)。与7个或更多个不同合作伙伴的频繁合著者中有三分之二主要是与以前的博士生一起发表,而不到三分之一的则是与同伴学者一起发表。频繁合著者中有将近85%与北美机构有联系;两个或更多位于英国,新加坡和香港。我们提供有关IS期刊中高合著率的见解。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号