【24h】

Comparing DEA and MCDM Method

机译:比较DEA和MCDM方法

获取原文

摘要

Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) introduces a model for weights determination maximizing efficiency of the decision-making units. The primary focus of the DEA model is to compare decision-making units (alternatives) in terms of their efficiency in converting inputs into outputs. A multicriteria decision making (MCDM) method uses a common set of weights that express a decision maker's preferences. In contrast, the DEA does not provide a common set of weights that could express the preferences of a decision maker. A comparison of DEA and MCDM shows that DEA resembles MCDM, but the results differ. In spite of these differences, DEA could be used as a supplement for screening alternatives within MCDM.
机译:数据包络分析(DEA)介绍了一种重量确定的模型,最大限度地提高了决策单元的效率。 DEA模型的主要焦点是将决策单元(替代方案)与其在转换为输出中的效率方面进行比较。 多轨道决策(MCDM)方法使用常见的一组权重,表达决策者的偏好。 相比之下,DEA不提供可以表达决策者的偏好的常见权重集合。 DEA和MCDM的比较表明,DEA类似于MCDM,但结果不同。 尽管有这些差异,DEA可以用作筛选MCDM中的替代品的补充。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号