首页> 外文会议>HIC 2018 >Pending Laboratory Test Results at the Time of Discharge: A 3-Year Retrospective Comparison of Paper Versus Electronic Test Ordering in Three Emergency Departments
【24h】

Pending Laboratory Test Results at the Time of Discharge: A 3-Year Retrospective Comparison of Paper Versus Electronic Test Ordering in Three Emergency Departments

机译:待定实验室测试结果在出院时:三个急诊部门的纸张与电子测试订购的3年的回顾比较

获取原文

摘要

Pending laboratory test results at discharge can have major adverse health outcomes. The availability of test results at discharge may depend on whether the tests were ordered electronically or by using a paper-based system. The aim of this study was to determine the rate of pending test results at time of discharge from Emergency Departments (ED), and compare the rate for paper-based and electronic orders across three EDs in New South Wales, Australia. This retrospective study described 71,466 ED presentations with 357,476 laboratory tests across three years (2014-2016). Only patients who were treated in ED and eventually discharged from ED were included. Most tests were ordered using the electronic system (97.2%, n=347,469). The rate of pending test results was significantly lower for electronic orders (6.6%, n= 22,928) than for paper orders (9.7%, n=966): a difference of 3.1%. Similar differences were observed when analysis was done by year of ED presentation. Moreover, in a subgroup analysis that included the top five high volume tests, four of the five tests had significantly lower rates of pending test results for electronic orders than for paper-based orders. The study highlighted an important benefit of ordering tests via electronic system which can potentially improve patient outcomes.
机译:待定的实验室测试结果在出院时可能具有重大的不利健康结果。放电时的测试结果可取决于测试是否是电子方式的单位或通过使用纸张的系统。本研究的目的是确定从急诊部门(ED)排放时的未决测试结果的速度,并比较澳大利亚新南威尔士州新南威尔士州的纸张和电子订单的速度。这项回顾性研究描述了71,466篇ED演示文稿,三年(2014-2016)介绍了357,476个实验室测试。仅包括在ED治疗并最终从ED中排出的患者。使用电子系统订购大多数测试(97.2%,n = 347,469)。电子订单(6.6%,N = 22,928)的待处理结果率明显低于纸币(9.7%,n = 966):差异为3.1%。当ED呈现年份进行分析时,观察到了类似的差异。此外,在包含前五个高卷测试的亚组分析中,五种测试中的四个比基于纸张的订单的额外测试结果的速度显着降低。该研究强调了通过电子系统订购测试的重要益处,这可能会改善患者结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号